These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31730545)

  • 1. Priors in Bayesian Estimation under the Rasch Model.
    Kim SH; Cohen AS; Kwak M; Lee J
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(4):384-398. PubMed ID: 31730545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HBMIRT: A SAS macro for estimating uni- and multidimensional 1- and 2-parameter item response models in small (and large!) samples.
    Wagner W; Zitzmann S; Hecht M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4130-4161. PubMed ID: 38519726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Auxiliary Item Information in the Item Parameter Estimation of a Graded Response Model for a Small to Medium Sample Size: Empirical Versus Hierarchical Bayes Estimation.
    Naveiras M; Cho SJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):478-495. PubMed ID: 38027461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shrinkage with shrunken shoulders: Gibbs sampling shrinkage model posteriors with guaranteed convergence rates.
    Nishimura A; Suchard MA
    Bayesian Anal; 2023 Jun; 18(2):367-390. PubMed ID: 38770434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item Parameter Recovery: Sensitivity to Prior Distribution.
    DeMars CE; Satkus P
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Aug; 84(4):691-715. PubMed ID: 39055092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Gibbs sampling approach to linkage analysis.
    Thomas DC; Cortessis V
    Hum Hered; 1992; 42(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 1555847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating Confidence Intervals of Item Parameters When Some Item Parameters Take Priors in the 2PL and 3PL Models.
    Paek I; Lin Z; Chalmers RP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 36866071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Estimate the Treatment Effect for Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Liang X; Kamata A; Li J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1090-1114. PubMed ID: 33116328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian nonparametric approach for handling item and examinee heterogeneity in assessment data.
    Pan T; Shen W; Davis-Stober CP; Hu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):196-211. PubMed ID: 37727141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NON-LOCAL PRIORS FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL ESTIMATION.
    Rossell D; Telesca D
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):254-265. PubMed ID: 29881129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust Bayesian Regression with Synthetic Posterior Distributions.
    Hashimoto S; Sugasawa S
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jun; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33286432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Default Priors for the Intercept Parameter in Logistic Regressions.
    Boonstra PS; Barbaro RP; Sen A
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2019 May; 133():245-256. PubMed ID: 31530966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Easy, bias-free Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the psychometric function using the Palamedes Toolbox.
    Prins N
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):485-499. PubMed ID: 36703004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regularized Bayesian calibration and scoring of the WD-FAB IRT model improves predictive performance over marginal maximum likelihood.
    Chang JC; Porcino J; Rasch EK; Tang L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266350. PubMed ID: 35395055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian Generalized Explanatory Item Response Model to Account for Learning During the Test.
    Lozano JH; Revuelta J
    Psychometrika; 2021 Dec; 86(4):994-1015. PubMed ID: 34460068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian many-facet Rasch model with Markov modeling for rater severity drift.
    Uto M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3910-3928. PubMed ID: 36284065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A tutorial on bridge sampling.
    Gronau QF; Sarafoglou A; Matzke D; Ly A; Boehm U; Marsman M; Leslie DS; Forster JJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Steingroever H
    J Math Psychol; 2017 Dec; 81():80-97. PubMed ID: 29200501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full Bayesian analysis of double seasonal autoregressive models with real applications.
    Amin AA
    J Appl Stat; 2024; 51(8):1524-1544. PubMed ID: 38863804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crowdsourcing prior information to improve study design and data analysis.
    Chrabaszcz JS; Tidwell JW; Dougherty MR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188246. PubMed ID: 29145511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.