These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31732182)

  • 21. Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in two sub-antarctic soils: influence of an oleophilic fertilizer.
    Coulon F; Pelletier E; St Louis R; Gourhant L; Delille D
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Aug; 23(8):1893-901. PubMed ID: 15352478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Forensic differentiation of biogenic organic compounds from petroleum hydrocarbons in biogenic and petrogenic compounds cross-contaminated soils and sediments.
    Wang Z; Yang C; Kelly-Hooper F; Hollebone BP; Peng X; Brown CE; Landriault M; Sun J; Yang Z
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Feb; 1216(7):1174-91. PubMed ID: 19131067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hydrocarbon contamination changes the bacterial diversity of soil from around Scott Base, Antarctica.
    Saul DJ; Aislabie JM; Brown CE; Harris L; Foght JM
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 53(1):141-55. PubMed ID: 16329936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterization of Crude Oil Degrading Bacteria Isolated from Contaminated Soils Surrounding Gas Stations.
    Abou-Shanab RA; Eraky M; Haddad AM; Abdel-Gaffar AB; Salem AM
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 97(5):684-688. PubMed ID: 27655077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of hydrocarbons from a diesel fuel on the germination and early growth of subantarctic plants.
    Macoustra GK; King CK; Wasley J; Robinson SA; Jolley DF
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Jul; 17(7):1238-48. PubMed ID: 26121427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of liquid water and soil temperature on petroleum hydrocarbon toxicity in Antarctic soil.
    Schafer AN; Snape I; Siciliano SD
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2009 Jul; 28(7):1409-15. PubMed ID: 19245286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applicability of the bioluminescence inhibition test in the 96-well microplate format for PAH-solutions and elutriates of PAH-contaminated soils.
    Hirmann D; Loibner AP; Braun R; Szolar OH
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(6):1236-42. PubMed ID: 17169401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [CONTENT OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SOILS OF ANTARCTIC STATIONS REGIONS].
    Abakumov EV; Parnikoza IY; Lupachev AV; Lodygin ED; Gabov DN; Kunakh VA
    Gig Sanit; 2015; 94(7):20-5. PubMed ID: 26856135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon degradation in a petroleum-contaminated soil and microbial population and activity determination.
    Wu M; Li W; Dick WA; Ye X; Chen K; Kost D; Chen L
    Chemosphere; 2017 Feb; 169():124-130. PubMed ID: 27870933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Algal tests with soil suspensions and elutriates: a comparative evaluation for PAH-contaminated soils.
    Baun A; Justesen KB; Nyholm N
    Chemosphere; 2002 Jan; 46(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 11827282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of metal contamination using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) during remediation of a waste disposal site in Antarctica.
    Stark SC; Snape I; Graham NJ; Brennan JC; Gore DB
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 18175018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On site bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic tundra soils in inoculated biopiles.
    Mohn WW; Radziminski CZ; Fortin MC; Reimer KJ
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 57(1-2):242-7. PubMed ID: 11693928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Geochemical markers of soil anthropogenic contaminants in polar scientific stations nearby (Antarctica, King George Island).
    Prus W; Fabiańska MJ; Łabno R
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jun; 518-519():266-79. PubMed ID: 25770449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microbial diversity changes with rhizosphere and hydrocarbons in contrasting soils.
    Khan MAI; Biswas B; Smith E; Mahmud SA; Hasan NA; Khan MAW; Naidu R; Megharaj M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Jul; 156():434-442. PubMed ID: 29604472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterization of EPA's 16 priority pollutant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tank bottom solids and associated contaminated soils at oil exploration and production sites in Texas.
    Bojes HK; Pope PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 47(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 17291653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rhizoremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil using Australian native grasses.
    Gaskin SE; Bentham RH
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(17):3683-8. PubMed ID: 20569970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modelling of vapour intrusion into a building impacted by a fuel spill in Antarctica.
    McWatters RS; Rowe RK; Wilkins D; Spedding T; Hince G; Richardson J; Snape I
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():467-482. PubMed ID: 30388645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A critical analysis of isolation of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis from soil.
    Franco M; Bagagli E; Scapolio S; da Silva Lacaz C
    Med Mycol; 2000 Jun; 38(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 10892985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tolerance of Antarctic soil fungi to hydrocarbons.
    Hughes KA; Bridge P; Clark MS
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Jan; 372(2-3):539-48. PubMed ID: 17157897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distribution of Anaerobic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria in Soils from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica.
    Sampaio DS; Almeida JRB; de Jesus HE; Rosado AS; Seldin L; Jurelevicius D
    Microb Ecol; 2017 Nov; 74(4):810-820. PubMed ID: 28484799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.