181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31732481)
1. Combined gene essentiality scoring improves the prediction of cancer dependency maps.
Wang W; Malyutina A; Pessia A; Saarela J; Heckman CA; Tang J
EBioMedicine; 2019 Dec; 50():67-80. PubMed ID: 31732481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seed-effect modeling improves the consistency of genome-wide loss-of-function screens and identifies synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in cancer cells.
Jaiswal A; Peddinti G; Akimov Y; Wennerberg K; Kuznetsov S; Tang J; Aittokallio T
Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):51. PubMed ID: 28569207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.
Meyers RM; Bryan JG; McFarland JM; Weir BA; Sizemore AE; Xu H; Dharia NV; Montgomery PG; Cowley GS; Pantel S; Goodale A; Lee Y; Ali LD; Jiang G; Lubonja R; Harrington WF; Strickland M; Wu T; Hawes DC; Zhivich VA; Wyatt MR; Kalani Z; Chang JJ; Okamoto M; Stegmaier K; Golub TR; Boehm JS; Vazquez F; Root DE; Hahn WC; Tsherniak A
Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1779-1784. PubMed ID: 29083409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsupervised correction of gene-independent cell responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting.
Iorio F; Behan FM; Gonçalves E; Bhosle SG; Chen E; Shepherd R; Beaver C; Ansari R; Pooley R; Wilkinson P; Harper S; Butler AP; Stronach EA; Saez-Rodriguez J; Yusa K; Garnett MJ
BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):604. PubMed ID: 30103702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partial gene suppression improves identification of cancer vulnerabilities when CRISPR-Cas9 knockout is pan-lethal.
Krill-Burger JM; Dempster JM; Borah AA; Paolella BR; Root DE; Golub TR; Boehm JS; Hahn WC; McFarland JM; Vazquez F; Tsherniak A
Genome Biol; 2023 Aug; 24(1):192. PubMed ID: 37612728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring cancer dependencies on metabolic genes from large-scale genetic screens.
Lagziel S; Lee WD; Shlomi T
BMC Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 31039782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic mapping of cancer cell target dependencies using high-throughput drug screening in triple-negative breast cancer.
Wang T; Gautam P; Rousu J; Aittokallio T
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2020; 18():3819-3832. PubMed ID: 33335681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ACE: a probabilistic model for characterizing gene-level essentiality in CRISPR screens.
Hutton ER; Vakoc CR; Siepel A
Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 34556174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration.
McFarland JM; Ho ZV; Kugener G; Dempster JM; Montgomery PG; Bryan JG; Krill-Burger JM; Green TM; Vazquez F; Boehm JS; Golub TR; Hahn WC; Root DE; Tsherniak A
Nat Commun; 2018 Nov; 9(1):4610. PubMed ID: 30389920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PICKLES: the database of pooled in-vitro CRISPR knockout library essentiality screens.
Lenoir WF; Lim TL; Hart T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jan; 46(D1):D776-D780. PubMed ID: 29077937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OGEE v3: Online GEne Essentiality database with increased coverage of organisms and human cell lines.
Gurumayum S; Jiang P; Hao X; Campos TL; Young ND; Korhonen PK; Gasser RB; Bork P; Zhao XM; He LJ; Chen WH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Jan; 49(D1):D998-D1003. PubMed ID: 33084874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens.
Zernab Hassan A; Ward HN; Rahman M; Billmann M; Lee Y; Myers CL
bioRxiv; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36993440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CEN-tools: an integrative platform to identify the contexts of essential genes.
Sharma S; Dincer C; Weidemüller P; Wright GJ; Petsalaki E
Mol Syst Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e9698. PubMed ID: 33073517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 systems for large-scale functional screening.
Sun N; Petiwala S; Wang R; Lu C; Hu M; Ghosh S; Hao Y; Miller CP; Chung N
BMC Genomics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):225. PubMed ID: 30890156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interactive web application for processing, correcting, and visualizing genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; De Lucia RR; Cremaschi P; Perron U; Karakoc E; Mauri L; Fernandez C; Kluczynski KH; Anderson DS; Iorio F
Cell Rep Methods; 2023 Jan; 3(1):100373. PubMed ID: 36814834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A High-Resolution Genome-Wide CRISPR/Cas9 Viability Screen Reveals Structural Features and Contextual Diversity of the Human Cell-Essential Proteome.
Bertomeu T; Coulombe-Huntington J; Chatr-Aryamontri A; Bourdages KG; Coyaud E; Raught B; Xia Y; Tyers M
Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):. PubMed ID: 29038160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Network analysis of gene essentiality in functional genomics experiments.
Jiang P; Wang H; Li W; Zang C; Li B; Wong YJ; Meyer C; Liu JS; Aster JC; Liu XS
Genome Biol; 2015 Oct; 16():239. PubMed ID: 26518695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens.
Hassan AZ; Ward HN; Rahman M; Billmann M; Lee Y; Myers CL
Mol Syst Biol; 2023 Nov; 19(11):e11657. PubMed ID: 37750448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting gene knockout effects from expression data.
Rosenski J; Shifman S; Kaplan T
BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Feb; 16(1):26. PubMed ID: 36803845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deciphering essential cistromes using genome-wide CRISPR screens.
Fei T; Li W; Peng J; Xiao T; Chen CH; Wu A; Huang J; Zang C; Liu XS; Brown M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(50):25186-25195. PubMed ID: 31727847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
