These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31732889)

  • 41. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. BioMARK as electrophysiological tool for assessing children at risk for (central) auditory processing disorders without reading deficits.
    Kumar P; Singh NK
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():54-8. PubMed ID: 25804824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Objective measurement of physiological signal-to-noise gain in the brainstem response to a synthetic vowel.
    Prévost F; Laroche M; Marcoux AM; Dajani HR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 22688081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (speech-ABR) outcomes influenced by ethnicity?
    Zakaria MN; Jalaei B; Aw CL; Sidek D
    Neurol Sci; 2016 Jun; 37(6):943-8. PubMed ID: 26921173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.
    Tierney A; Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):145-50. PubMed ID: 21907782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
    Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Brainstem timing deficits in children with learning impairment may result from corticofugal origins.
    Song JH; Banai K; Kraus N
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):335-44. PubMed ID: 18493120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Brainstem responses to speech syllables.
    Russo N; Nicol T; Musacchia G; Kraus N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 115(9):2021-30. PubMed ID: 15294204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.
    Bidelman GM; Price CN; Shen D; Arnott SR; Alain C
    Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 382():107795. PubMed ID: 31479953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.
    Kumar UA; Vanaja CS
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Auditory brainstem timing predicts cerebral asymmetry for speech.
    Abrams DA; Nicol T; Zecker SG; Kraus N
    J Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 26(43):11131-7. PubMed ID: 17065453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of Early- and Late-Arriving Room Reflections on the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.
    Al Osman R; Giguère C; Dajani HR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 29401057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Encoding of speech sounds at auditory brainstem level in good and poor hearing aid performers.
    Shetty HN; Puttabasappa M
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2017; 83(5):512-522. PubMed ID: 27516129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Relationships of electrophysiological characteristic between speech evoked auditory brainstem response and auditory mismatch negativity].
    Fu Q; Liang Y; Zou A; Wang T
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 29(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25966553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Association between speech perception in noise and electrophysiological measures: an exploratory study of possible techniques to evaluate cochlear synaptopathy in humans.
    Megarbane L; Fuente A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):427-433. PubMed ID: 32003267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function.
    Dhar S; Abel R; Hornickel J; Nicol T; Skoe E; Zhao W; Kraus N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):959-66. PubMed ID: 19346159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Auditory brainstem, middle and late latency responses to short gaps in noise at different presentation rates.
    Alhussaini K; Bohorquez J; Delgado RE; Ozdamar O
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 29378459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Auditory perception in individuals with Friedreich's ataxia.
    Rance G; Corben L; Barker E; Carew P; Chisari D; Rogers M; Dowell R; Jamaluddin S; Bryson R; Delatycki MB
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(4):229-40. PubMed ID: 19893304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.