These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31732970)

  • 1. Antagonistic coevolution between hosts and sexually transmitted infections.
    Ashby B
    Evolution; 2020 Jan; 74(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 31732970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual Conflict and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs): Coevolution of Sexually Antagonistic Host Traits with an STI.
    Wardlaw AM; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2019 Jan; 193(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 30624111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coevolution of parasite virulence and host mating strategies.
    Ashby B; Boots M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13290-5. PubMed ID: 26430236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.
    Aubier TG; Kokko H; Joron M
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5122. PubMed ID: 31719522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is sterility virulence most common in sexually transmitted infections? Examining the role of epidemiology.
    McLeod DV; Day T
    Evolution; 2019 May; 73(5):872-882. PubMed ID: 30859562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin.
    Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid Antagonistic Coevolution in an Emerging Pathogen and Its Vertebrate Host.
    Bonneaud C; Giraudeau M; Tardy L; Staley M; Hill GE; McGraw KJ
    Curr Biol; 2018 Sep; 28(18):2978-2983.e5. PubMed ID: 30197084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexually transmitted diseases in polygynous mating systems: prevalence and impact on reproductive success.
    Thrall PH; Antonovics J; Dobson AP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1452):1555-63. PubMed ID: 11007332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of risky behaviour in the presence of a sexually transmitted disease.
    Boots M; Knell RJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 269(1491):585-9. PubMed ID: 11916474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexually transmitted infection and the evolution of serial monogamy.
    McLeod DV; Day T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141726. PubMed ID: 25320174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coevolution between parasite virulence and host life-history traits.
    Gandon S; Agnew P; Michalakis Y
    Am Nat; 2002 Sep; 160(3):374-88. PubMed ID: 18707446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of defensive symbionts in host-parasite coevolution.
    Vorburger C; Perlman SJ
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 Nov; 93(4):1747-1764. PubMed ID: 29663622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.
    Brennan PL; Prum RO
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2015 Jul; 7(7):a017749. PubMed ID: 26134314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.