These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31733172)

  • 1. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
    Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utilizing Medical Students as Internal Assets to Enhance Gross Anatomy Laboratory Learning.
    Williams SE; Hawkins HG; Khalil MK
    Clin Anat; 2020 Mar; 33(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 31688953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course.
    McNulty JA; Espiritu BR; Hoyt AE; Ensminger DC; Chandrasekhar AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24596276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of preclinical medical students' preference for summative or formative assessment for physiology learning.
    Rae MG; Abdulla MH
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Sep; 47(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 37141432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementing Formative Assessment in Human Anatomy Practical Sessions: Medical Students' Perception and Effect on Final Exam Performance.
    Atwa HS; Potu BK; Fadel RA; Deifalla AS; Fatima A; Othman MA; Sarwani NAL; Nasr El-Din WA
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2024; 15():551-563. PubMed ID: 38884014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students.
    Chisnall B; Vince T; Hall S; Tribe R
    Int J Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 6():76-83. PubMed ID: 26094249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Undergraduate Medical Students' Usage and Perceptions of Anatomical Case-Based Learning: Comparison of Facilitated Small Group Discussions and eLearning Resources.
    Holland JC; Pawlikowska T
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 May; 12(3):245-256. PubMed ID: 30378294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential effects of two types of formative assessment in predicting performance of first-year medical students.
    Krasne S; Wimmers PF; Relan A; Drake TA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 16729243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity of Engagement and Feedback Assessments (EFAs): identifying students at risk of failing.
    Kemp PR; Bradshaw JM; Pandya B; Davies D; Morrell MJ; Sam AH
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Nov; 23(1):866. PubMed ID: 37968656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of undergraduate medical students' preference to human anatomy practical assessment methodology: a comparison between online and traditional methods.
    Sadeesh T; Prabavathy G; Ganapathy A
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Apr; 43(4):531-535. PubMed ID: 33386929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy.
    Svensäter G; Rohlin M
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2023 Feb; 27(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 35132742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
    Mitra NK; Barua A
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy.
    Guimarães B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can performance on summative evaluation of wax-added dental anatomy projects be better predicted from the combination of supervised and unsupervised practice than from supervised practice alone?
    Radjaeipour G; Chambers DW; Geissberger M
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2016 Nov; 20(4):237-240. PubMed ID: 26272412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.