208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31733384)
1. Effect of Electronic Clinical Decision Support on Imaging for the Evaluation of Acute Low Back Pain in the Ambulatory Care Setting.
Chen D; Bhambhvani HP; Hom J; Mahoney M; Wintermark M; Sharp C; Ratliff J; Chen YR
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e874-e877. PubMed ID: 31733384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Clinical Decision Support-Generated Report Cards Versus Real-Time Alerts on Primary Care Provider Guideline Adherence for Low Back Pain Outpatient Lumbar Spine MRI Orders.
Zafar HM; Ip IK; Mills AM; Raja AS; Langlotz CP; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):386-394. PubMed ID: 30476451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utilization of medical services for the treatment of acute low back pain: conformance with clinical guidelines.
Schroth WS; Schectman JM; Elinsky EG; Panagides JC
J Gen Intern Med; 1992; 7(5):486-91. PubMed ID: 1403203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary care physicians' use of lumbar spine imaging tests: effects of guidelines and practice pattern feedback.
Freeborn DK; Shye D; Mullooly JP; Eraker S; Romeo J
J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 12(10):619-25. PubMed ID: 9346458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain.
Ip IK; Gershanik EF; Schneider LI; Raja AS; Mar W; Seltzer S; Healey MJ; Khorasani R
Am J Med; 2014 Jun; 127(6):512-8.e1. PubMed ID: 24513065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variation among Primary Care Physicians in the Use of Imaging for Older Patients with Acute Low Back Pain.
Tan A; Zhou J; Kuo YF; Goodwin JS
J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 31(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 26215847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Influencing Primary Care Providers' Unneeded Lumbar Spine MRI Orders for Acute, Uncomplicated Low-Back Pain: a Qualitative Study.
Nevedal AL; Lewis ET; Wu J; Jacobs J; Jarvik JG; Chou R; Barnett PG
J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1044-1051. PubMed ID: 31832927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Imaging Use for the Initial Evaluation of Low Back Pain by Primary Care Providers in the United States: 2011-2016.
Pakpoor J; Raad M; Harris A; Puvanesarajah V; Canner JK; Nadgir R; Jain A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1522-1527. PubMed ID: 31125539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients' role in the use of radiology testing for common office practice complaints.
Wilson IB; Dukes K; Greenfield S; Kaplan S; Hillman B
Arch Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 161(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 11176741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inappropriate ordering of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: are providers Choosing Wisely?
Gidwani R; Sinnott P; Avoundjian T; Lo J; Asch SM; Barnett PG
Am J Manag Care; 2016 Feb; 22(2):e68-76. PubMed ID: 26881322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging use for low back pain by Ontario primary care clinicians: protocol for a mixed methods study - the Back ON study.
French SD; Green ME; Bhatia RS; Peng Y; Hayden JA; Hartvigsen J; Ivers NM; Grimshaw JM; Booth CM; Rühland L; Norman KE
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Feb; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 30711002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized Clinical Trial of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Improving the Appropriateness Scores for Ordering Imaging Studies in Primary and Specialty Care Ambulatory Clinics.
Palen TE; Sharpe RE; Shetterly SM; Steiner JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 31310183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in Hospital Performance on the Medicare National Outpatient Imaging Metrics: A 5-Year Longitudinal Cohort Analysis.
Narayan AK; Rosenkrantz AB; Wang GX; Daye D; Durand DJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 31125543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing practice pattern differences in the treatment of acute low back pain in the United States Military Health System.
Dietrich EJ; Leroux T; Santiago CF; Helgeson MD; Richard P; Koehlmoos TP
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Sep; 18(1):720. PubMed ID: 30223830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Decision Support Decreases Volume of Imaging for Low Back Pain in an Urban Emergency Department.
Min A; Chan VWY; Aristizabal R; Peramaki ER; Agulnik DB; Strydom N; Ramsey D; Forster BB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jul; 14(7):889-899. PubMed ID: 28483544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging.
Blackmore CC; Mecklenburg RS; Kaplan GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jan; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 21211760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. The North Carolina Back Pain Project.
Carey TS; Garrett J
Ann Intern Med; 1996 Nov; 125(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 8928987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A national intervention to reduce imaging for low back pain by general practitioners: a retrospective economic program evaluation using Medicare Benefits Schedule data.
Morgan T; Wu J; Ovchinikova L; Lindner R; Blogg S; Moorin R
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Dec; 19(1):983. PubMed ID: 31864352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Lumbar spine radiography – unreliable diagnostic accuracy and negligible value for the patients].
Annertz M; Andrén-Sandberg Å; Aspelin P; Fridén T; Geijer M; Nyman U
Lakartidningen; 2017 Nov; 114():. PubMed ID: 29292917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk Stratification to Decrease Unnecessary Diagnostic Imaging for Acute Appendicitis.
Depinet H; von Allmen D; Towbin A; Hornung R; Ho M; Alessandrini E
Pediatrics; 2016 Sep; 138(3):. PubMed ID: 27553220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
