201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31733431)
1. Differentiating diffuse from focal pattern on Computed Tomography in multiple myeloma: Added value of a Radiomics approach.
Tagliafico AS; Cea M; Rossi F; Valdora F; Bignotti B; Succio G; Gualco S; Conte A; Dominietto A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108739. PubMed ID: 31733431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe).
Nanni C; Zamagni E; Versari A; Chauvie S; Bianchi A; Rensi M; Bellò M; Rambaldi I; Gallamini A; Patriarca F; Gay F; Gamberi B; Cavo M; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 26475305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subspecialty Second-Opinion in Multiple Myeloma CT: Emphasis on Clinically Significant Lytic Lesions.
Tagliafico AS; Belgioia L; Bonsignore A; Rossi F; Succio G; Bignotti B; Dominietto A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 32340143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in the prediction of outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: a comparative study.
Fonti R; Pace L; Cerchione C; Catalano L; Salvatore B; De Luca S; Pane F; Salvatore M; Del Vecchio S
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 40(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 25608167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-Body Low-Dose CT in Multiple Myeloma: Diagnostic Value of Appendicular Medullary Patterns of Attenuation.
Koutoulidis V; Terpos E; Klapa I; Cheliotis G; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I; Boultadaki A; Gavriatopoulou M; Kastritis E; Dimopoulos MA; Moulopoulos LA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):742-751. PubMed ID: 33439048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-energy CT of the bone marrow in multiple myeloma: diagnostic accuracy for quantitative differentiation of infiltration patterns.
Kosmala A; Weng AM; Krauss B; Knop S; Bley TA; Petritsch B
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5083-5090. PubMed ID: 29882069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between magnetic resonance imaging patterns and baseline disease features in multiple myeloma: analyzing surrogates of tumour mass and biology.
Mai EK; Hielscher T; Kloth JK; Merz M; Shah S; Hillengass M; Wagner B; Hose D; Raab MS; Jauch A; Delorme S; Goldschmidt H; Weber MA; Hillengass J
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3939-3948. PubMed ID: 26767378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma.
Fonti R; Salvatore B; Quarantelli M; Sirignano C; Segreto S; Petruzziello F; Catalano L; Liuzzi R; Rotoli B; Del Vecchio S; Pace L; Salvatore M
J Nucl Med; 2008 Feb; 49(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18199607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. (18)F-FDG dynamic PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: patterns of tracer uptake and correlation with bone marrow plasma cell infiltration rate.
Sachpekidis C; Mai EK; Goldschmidt H; Hillengass J; Hose D; Pan L; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):e300-7. PubMed ID: 25783508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of third-generation of VNCa dual-energy CT for differentiating diffuse marrow infiltration of multiple myeloma from red bone marrow.
Wang T; Zhou B; Zhang K; Yan C; Guan X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 May; 103(18):e38003. PubMed ID: 38701295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging findings and clinical features of patients with multiple myeloma with the prognostic effect of bone marrow focal and diffuse infiltration patterns on spine MRI.
Aribas BK; Arda K; Yologlu Z; Ciledag N; Aktas E; Ozdemir S; Dogan K; Fen T; Dagli M
Minerva Med; 2011 Apr; 102(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 21483398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Different Staging Systems for Multiple Myeloma: Can the MRI Pattern Play a Prognostic Role?
Filonzi G; Mancuso K; Zamagni E; Nanni C; Spinnato P; Cavo M; Fanti S; Salizzoni E; Bazzocchi A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):152-158. PubMed ID: 28418695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma.
Fonti R; Larobina M; Del Vecchio S; De Luca S; Fabbricini R; Catalano L; Pane F; Salvatore M; Pace L
J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1829-35. PubMed ID: 23071351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe).
Nanni C; Versari A; Chauvie S; Bertone E; Bianchi A; Rensi M; Bellò M; Gallamini A; Patriarca F; Gay F; Gamberi B; Ghedini P; Cavo M; Fanti S; Zamagni E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):712-719. PubMed ID: 29270787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of whole-body ultra-low dose computed tomography in comparison with spinal magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of disease in multiple myeloma.
Ippolito D; Talei Franzesi C; Spiga S; Besostri V; Pezzati S; Rossini F; Sironi S
Br J Haematol; 2017 May; 177(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 28233900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of radiomics for differentiating diffuse liver diseases on non-contrast CT.
Homayounieh F; Saini S; Mostafavi L; Doda Khera R; Sühling M; Schmidt B; Singh R; Flohr T; Kalra MK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Oct; 15(10):1727-1736. PubMed ID: 32592069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Traumatic bone marrow edema of the calcaneus: Evaluation of color-coded virtual non-calcium dual-energy CT in a multi-reader diagnostic accuracy study.
Booz C; Nöske J; Albrecht MH; Lenga L; Martin SS; Wichmann JL; Huizinga NA; Eichler K; Nour-Eldin NA; Vogl TJ; Yel I
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():207-214. PubMed ID: 31439244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma.
Breyer RJ; Mulligan ME; Smith SE; Line BR; Badros AZ
Skeletal Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(9):632-40. PubMed ID: 16758246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Staging of multiple myeloma with MRI: comparison to MSCT and conventional radiography].
Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser M
Radiologe; 2004 Sep; 44(9):874-81. PubMed ID: 15365631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
