187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31733513)
21. Optimization of Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry for Deep and Highly Sensitive Proteomic Analysis.
Kawashima Y; Watanabe E; Umeyama T; Nakajima D; Hattori M; Honda K; Ohara O
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 31779068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Colorectal Cancer Cell Line Proteomes Are Representative of Primary Tumors and Predict Drug Sensitivity.
Wang J; Mouradov D; Wang X; Jorissen RN; Chambers MC; Zimmerman LJ; Vasaikar S; Love CG; Li S; Lowes K; Leuchowius KJ; Jousset H; Weinstock J; Yau C; Mariadason J; Shi Z; Ban Y; Chen X; Coffey RJC; Slebos RJC; Burgess AW; Liebler DC; Zhang B; Sieber OM
Gastroenterology; 2017 Oct; 153(4):1082-1095. PubMed ID: 28625833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Explore, Visualize, and Analyze Functional Cancer Proteomic Data Using the Cancer Proteome Atlas.
Li J; Akbani R; Zhao W; Lu Y; Weinstein JN; Mills GB; Liang H
Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e51-e54. PubMed ID: 29092939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Advancing translational research and precision medicine with targeted proteomics.
Uzozie AC; Aebersold R
J Proteomics; 2018 Oct; 189():1-10. PubMed ID: 29476807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS.
Rosenberger G; Koh CC; Guo T; Röst HL; Kouvonen P; Collins BC; Heusel M; Liu Y; Caron E; Vichalkovski A; Faini M; Schubert OT; Faridi P; Ebhardt HA; Matondo M; Lam H; Bader SL; Campbell DS; Deutsch EW; Moritz RL; Tate S; Aebersold R
Sci Data; 2014; 1():140031. PubMed ID: 25977788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Human follicular fluid proteomic and peptidomic composition quantitative studies by SWATH-MS methodology. Applicability of high pH RP-HPLC fractionation.
Lewandowska AE; Macur K; Czaplewska P; Liss J; Łukaszuk K; Ołdziej S
J Proteomics; 2019 Jan; 191():131-142. PubMed ID: 29530678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical biomarker discovery by SWATH-MS based label-free quantitative proteomics: impact of criteria for identification of differentiators and data normalization method.
Narasimhan M; Kannan S; Chawade A; Bhattacharjee A; Govekar R
J Transl Med; 2019 May; 17(1):184. PubMed ID: 31151397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing SRM and SWATH Methods for Quantitation of Bovine Muscle Proteomes.
Wu W; Dai RT; Bendixen E
J Agric Food Chem; 2019 Feb; 67(5):1608-1618. PubMed ID: 30624930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of a Gill Assay Library for Ecological Proteomics of Threespine Sticklebacks (
Li J; Levitan B; Gomez-Jimenez S; Kültz D
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2018 Nov; 17(11):2146-2163. PubMed ID: 30093419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated Workflow for Peptide-Level Quantitation from DIA/SWATH-MS Data.
Gupta S; Röst H
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2228():453-468. PubMed ID: 33950509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducible Tissue Homogenization and Protein Extraction for Quantitative Proteomics Using MicroPestle-Assisted Pressure-Cycling Technology.
Shao S; Guo T; Gross V; Lazarev A; Koh CC; Gillessen S; Joerger M; Jochum W; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2016 Jun; 15(6):1821-9. PubMed ID: 27098501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Generation of a zebrafish SWATH-MS spectral library to quantify 10,000 proteins.
Blattmann P; Stutz V; Lizzo G; Richard J; Gut P; Aebersold R
Sci Data; 2019 Feb; 6():190011. PubMed ID: 30747917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of Protein Abundance Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tissues Using PCT-SWATH.
Zhu Y; Zhu J; Lu C; Zhang Q; Xie W; Sun P; Dong X; Yue L; Sun Y; Yi X; Zhu T; Ruan G; Aebersold R; Huang S; Guo T
Proteomics Clin Appl; 2019 Jan; 13(1):e1700179. PubMed ID: 30365225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-Throughput Proteomic Analysis of Fresh-Frozen Biopsy Tissue Samples Using Pressure Cycling Technology Coupled with SWATH Mass Spectrometry.
Zhu Y; Guo T
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():279-287. PubMed ID: 29071490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics and Software Tools: A Glimpse in 2020.
Zhang F; Ge W; Ruan G; Cai X; Guo T
Proteomics; 2020 Sep; 20(17-18):e1900276. PubMed ID: 32275110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automated SWATH Data Analysis Using Targeted Extraction of Ion Chromatograms.
Röst HL; Aebersold R; Schubert OT
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():289-307. PubMed ID: 28188537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In-depth proteomic analyses of ovarian cancer cell line exosomes reveals differential enrichment of functional categories compared to the NCI 60 proteome.
Sinha A; Ignatchenko V; Ignatchenko A; Mejia-Guerrero S; Kislinger T
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Mar; 445(4):694-701. PubMed ID: 24434149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. rcellminer: exploring molecular profiles and drug response of the NCI-60 cell lines in R.
Luna A; Rajapakse VN; Sousa FG; Gao J; Schultz N; Varma S; Reinhold W; Sander C; Pommier Y
Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(8):1272-4. PubMed ID: 26635141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Arabidopsis proteome and the mass spectral assay library.
Zhang H; Liu P; Guo T; Zhao H; Bensaddek D; Aebersold R; Xiong L
Sci Data; 2019 Nov; 6(1):278. PubMed ID: 31757973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Testing Suitability of Cell Cultures for SILAC-Experiments Using SWATH-Mass Spectrometry.
Reinders Y; Völler D; Bosserhoff AK; Oefner PJ; Reinders J
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1394():101-108. PubMed ID: 26700044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
