300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31733603)
1. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users' characteristics.
Rangraz Jeddi F; Nabovati E; Bigham R; Khajouei R
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Jan; 133():104026. PubMed ID: 31733603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability evaluation of selected picture archiving and communication systems at the national level: Analysis of users' viewpoints.
Farzandipour M; Sadeqi Jabali M; Nickfarjam AM; Tadayon H
Int J Med Inform; 2021 Mar; 147():104372. PubMed ID: 33421687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between user interface problems of an admission, discharge and transfer module and usability features: a usability testing method.
Farrahi R; Rangraz Jeddi F; Nabovati E; Sadeqi Jabali M; Khajouei R
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31445520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.
Kaipio J; Kuusisto A; Hyppönen H; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104018. PubMed ID: 31835158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.
van Engen-Verheul MM; Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Peek N; Jaspers MW
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():15-26. PubMed ID: 26806708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmentation of the think aloud method with users' perspectives for the selection of a picture archiving and communication system.
Zahiri Esfahani M; Khajouei R; Baneshi MR
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Apr; 80():43-51. PubMed ID: 29501909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Nurses' Satisfaction With Two Nursing Information Systems.
Khajouei R; Abbasi R
Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Jun; 35(6):307-314. PubMed ID: 28060182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usability study of the EduMod eLearning Program for contouring nodal stations of the head and neck.
Deraniyagala R; Amdur RJ; Boyer AL; Kaylor S
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(3):169-175. PubMed ID: 25537313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of usability principles and interface design for mobile e-books.
Wang CM; Huang CH
Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1253-65. PubMed ID: 25680001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usability evaluation of emergency information systems in educational hospitals in Kerman, Iran.
Behnam F; Khajouei R; Nabizadeh AH; Saedi S; Ghaemi MM
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Nov; 23(1):277. PubMed ID: 38037020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. End-user participation in health information systems (HIS) development: Physicians' and nurses' experiences.
Martikainen S; Kaipio J; Lääveri T
Int J Med Inform; 2020 May; 137():104117. PubMed ID: 32179254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems.
Bagheri F; Abbasi F; Sadeghi M; Khajouei R
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Jan; 23(1):23. PubMed ID: 36717854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Mobile Web App to Improve Health Screening Uptake in Men (ScreenMen): Utility and Usability Evaluation Study.
Teo CH; Ng CJ; Lo SK; Lim CD; White A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e10216. PubMed ID: 30985280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From users involvement to users' needs understanding: a case study.
Niès J; Pelayo S
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 19660983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliance with design principles: a case study of a widely used laboratory information system.
Agharezaei Z; Khajouei R; Ahmadian L; Agharezaei L
East Mediterr Health J; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1456-1464. PubMed ID: 33355384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. User-centred web design, usability and user satisfaction: The case of online banking websites in Iran.
Dianat I; Adeli P; Asgari Jafarabadi M; Karimi MA
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102892. PubMed ID: 31422242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the usability of a mobile app for adolescent obesity management.
O'Malley G; Dowdall G; Burls A; Perry IJ; Curran N
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2014 Jun; 2(2):e29. PubMed ID: 25098237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. User Interface Problems of a Nationwide Inpatient Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.
Atashi A; Khajouei R; Azizi A; Dadashi A
Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 27081409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
