These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31734200)

  • 1. Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Algorithm.
    Martin SS; van Assen M; Rapaka S; Hudson HT; Fischer AM; Varga-Szemes A; Sahbaee P; Schwemmer C; Gulsun MA; Cimen S; Sharma P; Vogl TJ; Schoepf UJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):524-526. PubMed ID: 31734200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of morphological assessment of coronary artery calcification with electrocardiography-gated non-contrast computed tomography: a comparative study with optical coherence tomography.
    Takahashi Y; Toba T; Otake H; Fukuyama Y; Nakano S; Matsuoka Y; Tanimura K; Izawa Y; Kawamori H; Kono AK; Fujiwara S; Hirata KI
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1445-1453. PubMed ID: 33151511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative coronary plaque analysis predicts high-risk plaque morphology on coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the ROMICAT II trial.
    Liu T; Maurovich-Horvat P; Mayrhofer T; Puchner SB; Lu MT; Ghemigian K; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Pursnani A; Hoffmann U; Ferencik M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 34(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 28803421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a calcium deblooming algorithm on accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Weir-McCall JR; Wang R; Halankar J; Hsieh J; Hague CJ; Rosenblatt S; Fan Z; Sellers SL; Murphy DT; Blanke P; Xu L; Leipsic JA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 31378687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: Ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges.
    Azour L; Kadoch MA; Ward TJ; Eber CD; Jacobi AH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27743881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary calcium scoring from contrast coronary CT angiography using a semiautomated standardized method.
    Schuhbaeck A; Otaki Y; Achenbach S; Schneider C; Slomka P; Berman DS; Dey D
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 26169700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a fully automated deep learning-enabled solution for CCTA atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis quantification in a diverse real-world cohort.
    Lorenzatti D; Filtz A; Pina P; Scotti A; Schenone AL; Gongora CA; Kwan AC; Cheng VY; Garcia MJ; Berman DS; Slomka PJ; Dey D; Slipczuk L
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(5):507-509. PubMed ID: 38553402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of routine high-resolution computed tomography scans against gated cardiac CT for the assessment of coronary artery calcification.
    Enevoldsen FC; Næser EU; Winther S; Bøttcher M; Søndergaard K; Hauge EM
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(3):311-313. PubMed ID: 38342734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence in coronary artery calcium score: rationale, different approaches, and outcomes.
    Gennari AG; Rossi A; De Cecco CN; van Assen M; Sartoretti T; Giannopoulos AA; Schwyzer M; Huellner MW; Messerli M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 May; 40(5):951-966. PubMed ID: 38700819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR
    Li S; Chen C; Qin L; Gu S; Zhang H; Yan F; Yang W
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 32130576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry.
    Tesche C; Otani K; De Cecco CN; Coenen A; De Geer J; Kruk M; Kim YH; Albrecht MH; Baumann S; Renker M; Bayer RR; Duguay TM; Litwin SE; Varga-Szemes A; Steinberg DH; Yang DH; Kepka C; Persson A; Nieman K; Schoepf UJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 13(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 31422141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition.
    Xia C; Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Rook M; Xie X; Alsurayhi A; van Ooijen PMA; van Bolhuis JN; Oudkerk M; Dorrius M; van der Harst P; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 32505593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.
    Molloi S; Johnson T; Ding H; Lipinski J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 27838897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning.
    Brandt V; Emrich T; Schoepf UJ; Dargis DM; Bayer RR; De Cecco CN; Tesche C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 32623625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine learning in cardiac CT: Basic concepts and contemporary data.
    Singh G; Al'Aref SJ; Van Assen M; Kim TS; van Rosendael A; Kolli KK; Dwivedi A; Maliakal G; Pandey M; Wang J; Do V; Gummalla M; De Cecco CN; Min JK
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 29754806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of CAC Scoring on Nongated Compared With Gated Cardiac CT Scans From MESA.
    Almeida SO; Honoris L; Defranco A; Port S; Li D; Nasir K; Kronmal R; Barr RG; Budoff M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 13(1 Pt 1):177-178. PubMed ID: 31542523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability analysis of visual ranking of coronary artery calcification on low-dose CT of the thorax for lung cancer screening: comparison with ECG-gated calcium scoring CT.
    Kim YK; Sung YM; Cho SH; Park YN; Choi HY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():81-7. PubMed ID: 25084979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary artery calcium in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy.
    Takx RAP; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Pilz LR; Schoenberg SO; Morris PB; Henzler T; Apfaltrer P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1425-1431. PubMed ID: 28342038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
    Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.