BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31734242)

  • 1. Neural representation of bat predation risk and evasive flight in moths: A modelling approach.
    Goerlitz HR; Hofstede HMT; Holderied MW
    J Theor Biol; 2020 Feb; 486():110082. PubMed ID: 31734242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community.
    ter Hofstede HM; Goerlitz HR; Ratcliffe JM; Holderied MW; Surlykke A
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Nov; 216(Pt 21):3954-62. PubMed ID: 23913945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of bat echolocation call duration and timing on auditory encoding of predator distance in noctuoid moths.
    Gordon SD; Ter Hofstede HM
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Mar; 221(Pt 6):. PubMed ID: 29567831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life.
    Fullard JH; Dawson JW; Jacobs DS
    J Exp Biol; 2003 Jan; 206(Pt 2):281-94. PubMed ID: 12477898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolutionary escalation: the bat-moth arms race.
    Ter Hofstede HM; Ratcliffe JM
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Jun; 219(Pt 11):1589-602. PubMed ID: 27252453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early erratic flight response of the lucerne moth to the quiet echolocation calls of distant bats.
    Nakano R; Mason AC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202679. PubMed ID: 30125318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron.
    Ratcliffe JM; Fullard JH; Arthur BJ; Hoy RR
    Biol Lett; 2009 Jun; 5(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 19324625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High duty cycle pulses suppress orientation flights of crambid moths.
    Nakano R; Ihara F; Mishiro K; Toyama M; Toda S
    J Insect Physiol; 2015 Dec; 83():15-21. PubMed ID: 26549128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic camouflage increases with body size and changes with bat echolocation frequency range in a community of nocturnally active Lepidoptera.
    Simon R; Dreissen A; Leroy H; Berg MP; Halfwerk W
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Dec; 92(12):2363-2372. PubMed ID: 37882060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.
    Cobo-Cuan A; Kössl M; Mora EC
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Sep; 203(9):707-715. PubMed ID: 28421281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moth hearing in response to bat echolocation calls manipulated independently in time and frequency.
    Jones G; Waters DA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1453):1627-32. PubMed ID: 11467425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surviving cave bats: auditory and behavioural defences in the Australian noctuid moth, Speiredonia spectans.
    Fullard JH; Jackson ME; Jacobs DS; Pavey CR; Burwell CJ
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 24):3808-15. PubMed ID: 19043053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustainable pest control inspired by prey-predator ultrasound interactions.
    Nakano R; Ito A; Tokumaru S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(43):e2211007119. PubMed ID: 36215520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrasting laboratory and field outcomes of bat-moth interactions.
    Lin A; Li J; Hu Y; Zhong M; Yu M; Ma N; Wei T; Luo J; Feng J
    Mol Ecol; 2023 Nov; 32(21):5864-5876. PubMed ID: 37789799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Support for the allotonic frequency hypothesis in an insectivorous bat community.
    Schoeman MC; Jacobs DS
    Oecologia; 2003 Jan; 134(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 12647192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound strategies: the 65-million-year-old battle between bats and insects.
    Conner WE; Corcoran AJ
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2012; 57():21-39. PubMed ID: 21888517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.
    Corcoran AJ; Wagner RD; Conner WE
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63609. PubMed ID: 23671686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory sensitivity of Hawaiian moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and selective predation by the Hawaiian hoary bat (Chiroptera: Lasiurus cinereus semotus).
    Fullard JH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jul; 268(1474):1375-80. PubMed ID: 11429137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation to counter moth hearing.
    Goerlitz HR; ter Hofstede HM; Zeale MR; Jones G; Holderied MW
    Curr Biol; 2010 Sep; 20(17):1568-72. PubMed ID: 20727755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth.
    Windmill JF; Jackson JC; Tuck EJ; Robert D
    Curr Biol; 2006 Dec; 16(24):2418-23. PubMed ID: 17174915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.