These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31734555)

  • 1. Assessment of ion recombination correction and polarity effects for specific ionization chambers in flattening-filter-free photon beams.
    Martin-Martin G; Aguilar PB; Barbés B; Guibelalde E
    Phys Med; 2019 Nov; 67():176-184. PubMed ID: 31734555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ion recombination and polarity corrections for small-volume ionization chambers in high-dose-rate, flattening-filter-free pulsed photon beams.
    Hyun MA; Miller JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):618-627. PubMed ID: 28001291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: Point-by-point ion-recombination correction for accurate dose profile measurement in high dose-per-pulse irradiation field.
    Kojima H; Ishikawa M; Takigami M
    Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7281-7293. PubMed ID: 37528637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polarity correction factor for flattening filter free photon beams in several cylindrical ionization chambers.
    Ogata T; Uehara K; Nakayama M; Tsudou S; Masutani T; Okayama T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 26873138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric impact of failing to apply correction factors to ion recombination in percentage depth dose measurements and the volume-averaging effect in flattening filter-free beams.
    Martin-Martin G; Walter S; Guibelalde E
    Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():176-180. PubMed ID: 32871458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation.
    Wang Y; Easterling SB; Ting JY
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3758. PubMed ID: 22955642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ion-recombination correction for different ionization chambers in high dose rate flattening-filter-free photon beams.
    Lang S; Hrbacek J; Leong A; Klöck S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(9):2819-27. PubMed ID: 22510780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of recombination and polarity correction factors, k
    Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Kranzer R
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Aug; 28(3):247-253. PubMed ID: 29336934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of the recombination correction factor kS for some specific plane-parallel and cylindrical ionization chambers in pulsed photon and electron beams.
    Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Schmachtenberg A; Schmid F; Schüle E
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):N35-50. PubMed ID: 17202615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical Note: Preferred dosimeter size and associated correction factors in commissioning high dose per pulse, flattening filter free x-ray beams.
    Sudhyadhom A; Kirby N; Faddegon B; Chuang CF
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1507-13. PubMed ID: 26936734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CyberKnife reference dosimetry: An assessment of the impact of evolving recommendations on correction factors and measured dose.
    Buchegger N; Grogan G; Hug B; Oliver C; Ebert M
    Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3573-3585. PubMed ID: 32311095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ion recombination correction factors (P(ion)) for Varian TrueBeam high-dose-rate therapy beams.
    Kry SF; Popple R; Molineu A; Followill DS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 13(6):3803. PubMed ID: 23149774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of k
    de Prez L; de Pooter J; Jansen B; Perik T; Wittkämper F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045023. PubMed ID: 29461974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical Note: Correction for intra-chamber dose gradients in reference dosimetry of flattening-filter-free MV photon beams.
    Ruggieri R; Naccarato S; Stavrev P; Stavreva N; Pasetto S; Salamone I; Alongi F
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4729. PubMed ID: 27487890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols.
    McCaw TJ; Hwang MS; Jang SY; Huq MS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):140-143. PubMed ID: 28574211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental determination of the recombination correction factor k
    Schönfeld AB; Schönfeld AA; Looe HK; Poppe B; de Wilde RL
    Z Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 30(4):300-304. PubMed ID: 32278506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of the role of lead foil in flattening filter free beam reference dosimetry.
    Gao S; Nelson C; Wang C; Kathriarachchi V; Choi M; Saxena R; Kendall R; Balter P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 24(4):e13960. PubMed ID: 36913192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.