These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31734945)

  • 1. The ethics approval process for multisite research studies in Australia: changes sought by the Australian Genomics initiative.
    Haas MA; Boughtwood TF; Quinn MC;
    Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211(10):440-444.e1. PubMed ID: 31734945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Growing pains: central review board project still developing.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 May; 95(9):636-7. PubMed ID: 12734305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who watches the watchmen?
    Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7359):125. PubMed ID: 21833048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian research ethics boards and multisite research: experiences from two minimal-risk studies.
    Racine E; Bell E; Deslauriers C
    IRB; 2010; 32(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20590052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Germany opposes EU plans for regulating clinical trials owing to lack of ethical standards.
    Tuffs A
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6640. PubMed ID: 23033377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.
    Lux AL; Edwards SW; Osborne JP
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1182-3. PubMed ID: 10784542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The trouble with ethics committees.
    Meade TW
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 7802766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-centre research in Australia: analysis of a recent National Health and Medical Research Council-funded project.
    Kidd TJ; Marks GB; Bye PT; Wainwright CE; Robinson PJ; Rose BR; Harbour C; Bell SC;
    Respirology; 2009 Sep; 14(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 19740265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fees and research ethics committees.
    Pickworth E; Brazier M
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Oct; No. 151():18-20. PubMed ID: 11657986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Institutionalisation of Bulgarian ethics committees: history and current status.
    Krastev Y
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2011; 8(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 22106639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards a consensual culture in the ethical review of research. Australian Health Ethics Committee.
    Chalmers D; Pettit P
    Med J Aust; 1998 Jan; 168(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 9469189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement.
    Edwards SJ; Ashcroft R; Kirchin S
    Bioethics; 2004 Sep; 18(5):408-27. PubMed ID: 15462024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical ethics--past and future.
    Smallwood R
    Med J Aust; 1993 Apr; 158(7):444-5. PubMed ID: 8469190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy.
    Klitzman R; Pivovarova E; Lidz CW
    JAMA; 2017 May; 317(20):2061-2062. PubMed ID: 28445582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ethics of research ethics committees.
    Nicholl J
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1217. PubMed ID: 10784570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sex kitten of bioethics? Research ethics comes of age.
    Resink DB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 18949856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More comment from Westminster.
    Dalyell T
    New Sci; 1998 Oct; 160(2154):55. PubMed ID: 11657258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trials committees: how long is the protocol review and approval process in Spain? A prospective study.
    Ortega R; Dal-Ré R
    IRB; 1995; 17(4):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
    Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.