These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31735831)

  • 1. Location-Specific Orientation Set Is Independent of the Horizontal Benefit with or Without Object Boundaries.
    Chen Z; Humphries A; Cave KR
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Jun; 3(2):. PubMed ID: 31735831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is object-based attention not based on objects?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1062-1082. PubMed ID: 31021155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing.
    Schendel KL; Robertson LC; Treisman A
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):577-94. PubMed ID: 11436731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual field meridians modulate the reallocation of object-based attention.
    Barnas AJ; Greenberg AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 27150614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.
    Rizzolatti G; Riggio L; Dascola I; Umiltá C
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(1A):31-40. PubMed ID: 3574648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neutral location cues and cost/benefit analysis of visual attention shifts.
    Wright RD; Richard CM; McDonald JJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1995 Dec; 49(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 9183991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention.
    Yeari M; Goldsmith M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):565-579. PubMed ID: 20515189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Movement versus focusing of visual attention.
    Shepherd M; Müller HJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More power to the unconscious: conscious, but not unconscious, exogenous attention requires location variation.
    Lin Z; Murray SO
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Feb; 26(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25568064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target-object integration, attention distribution, and object orientation interactively modulate object-based selection.
    Al-Janabi S; Greenberg AS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1968-84. PubMed ID: 27198915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An attentional grasp reflex in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Jun; 33(6):689-701. PubMed ID: 7675161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention.
    Shomstein S; Yantis S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 15260189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1435-43. PubMed ID: 19064488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cue relevance effects in conjunctive visual search: cueing for location, color, and orientation.
    Zhuang X; Papathomas TV
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 21652771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal course of position shift for a peripheral target.
    Yamada Y; Miura K; Kawabe T
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21562033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.