310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31736473)
1. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses?
Heah NH; Tan RBW
Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 31736473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.
Wiedemann L; Cornu JN; Haab E; Peyrat L; Beley S; Cathelineau X; Haab F
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24053170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy.
Zheng DC; Xie MK; Bao JW; Yao HJ; Wang Z
J Vis Exp; 2022 Jun; (184):. PubMed ID: 35781527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined external urethral bulking and artificial urinary sphincter for urethral atrophy and stress urinary incontinence.
Rahman NU; Minor TX; Deng D; Lue TF
BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):824-6. PubMed ID: 15794791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-erosive urethral perforation between tandem artificial urinary sphincter cuffs.
Baumgartner TS; Hudak SJ
Can J Urol; 2016 Apr; 23(2):8240-2. PubMed ID: 27085831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions.
Trost L; Elliott D
Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate.
Rabinowitz MJ; Haney NM; Liu JL; Dani H; Cohen AJ; Wright EJ
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():253-256. PubMed ID: 34343563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient.
Sathianathen NJ; McGuigan SM; Moon DA
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 24131859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?
Cousin T; Peyronnet B; Bentellis I; Lasri S; Taha F; Hermieu N; Boileau A; Zelmar A; Ciolek C; Dubois A; Leon P; Hermieu JF; Brierre T; Gamé X; Tricard T; Saussine C; Lecoanet P; Vidart A; Bruyère F; Cornu JN; Monsaint H; Biardeau X; Capon G
World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3663-3669. PubMed ID: 37902863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of perioperative anticoagulation on artificial urinary sphincter device survival.
Blackburne AT; Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):339-341. PubMed ID: 28580867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dysfunctions of artificial urinary sphincters (AMS 800) and their management via a transscrotal access. Optimum procedure illustrated by reference to clinical examples].
van der Horst C; Naumann CM; Wilson SK; Wefer B; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
Urologe A; 2007 Dec; 46(12):1704-9. PubMed ID: 17932644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
