These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31737047)

  • 1. Selective Sampling of Species and Fossils Influences Age Estimates Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Model.
    Matschiner M
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():1064. PubMed ID: 31737047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using more than the oldest fossils: dating osmundaceae with three Bayesian clock approaches.
    Grimm GW; Kapli P; Bomfleur B; McLoughlin S; Renner SS
    Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 25503771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fossilized birth-death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates.
    Heath TA; Huelsenbeck JP; Stadler T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(29):E2957-66. PubMed ID: 25009181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total-Evidence Dating under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.
    Zhang C; Stadler T; Klopfstein S; Heath TA; Ronquist F
    Syst Biol; 2016 Mar; 65(2):228-49. PubMed ID: 26493827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ignoring stratigraphic age uncertainty leads to erroneous estimates of species divergence times under the fossilized birth-death process.
    Barido-Sottani J; Aguirre-Fernández G; Hopkins MJ; Stadler T; Warnock R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 May; 286(1902):20190685. PubMed ID: 31064306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Fossil Sampling on the Estimation of Divergence Times with the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.
    O'Reilly JE; Donoghue PCJ
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jan; 69(1):124-138. PubMed ID: 31127936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of Taxon-Sampling Schemes on Bayesian Tip Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.
    Luo A; Zhang C; Zhou QS; Ho SYW; Zhu CD
    Syst Biol; 2023 Aug; 72(4):781-801. PubMed ID: 36919368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian Phylogenetic Estimation of Clade Ages Supports Trans-Atlantic Dispersal of Cichlid Fishes.
    Matschiner M; Musilová Z; Barth JM; Starostová Z; Salzburger W; Steel M; Bouckaert R
    Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 66(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 28173588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian Total-Evidence Dating Reveals the Recent Crown Radiation of Penguins.
    Gavryushkina A; Heath TA; Ksepka DT; Stadler T; Welch D; Drummond AJ
    Syst Biol; 2017 Jan; 66(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 28173531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring the Total-Evidence Timescale of Marattialean Fern Evolution in the Face of Model Sensitivity.
    May MR; Contreras DL; Sundue MA; Nagalingum NS; Looy CV; Rothfels CJ
    Syst Biol; 2021 Oct; 70(6):1232-1255. PubMed ID: 33760075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skyline Fossilized Birth-Death Model is Robust to Violations of Sampling Assumptions in Total-Evidence Dating.
    Zhang C; Ronquist F; Stadler T
    Syst Biol; 2023 Dec; 72(6):1316-1336. PubMed ID: 37605524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Simulation-Based Evaluation of Tip-Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.
    Luo A; Duchêne DA; Zhang C; Zhu CD; Ho SYW
    Syst Biol; 2020 Mar; 69(2):325-344. PubMed ID: 31132125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical and Bayesian approaches to fossil-only divergence times: A study across three reptile clades.
    Turner AH; Pritchard AC; Matzke NJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169885. PubMed ID: 28187191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Species relationships and divergence times in beeches: new insights from the inclusion of 53 young and old fossils in a birth-death clock model.
    Renner SS; Grimm GW; Kapli P; Denk T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 371(1699):. PubMed ID: 27325832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates.
    Brown JW; Smith SA
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 28945912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian phylogenetic estimation of fossil ages.
    Drummond AJ; Stadler T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 371(1699):. PubMed ID: 27325827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divergence times in demosponges (Porifera): first insights from new mitogenomes and the inclusion of fossils in a birth-death clock model.
    Schuster A; Vargas S; Knapp IS; Pomponi SA; Toonen RJ; Erpenbeck D; Wörheide G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):114. PubMed ID: 30021516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):212-26. PubMed ID: 16177230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fossils Do Not Substantially Improve, and May Even Harm, Estimates of Diversification Rate Heterogeneity.
    Beaulieu JM; O'Meara BC
    Syst Biol; 2023 May; 72(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 35861420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fossils matter: improved estimates of divergence times in Pinus reveal older diversification.
    Saladin B; Leslie AB; Wüest RO; Litsios G; Conti E; Salamin N; Zimmermann NE
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):95. PubMed ID: 28376717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.