123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31737101)
1. Effect of lymph nodes count in node-positive gastric cancer.
Zhang W; Zhangyuan G; Wang J; Jin K; Liu Y; Wang F; Yu W; Zhang H; Li G; Yu D; Chen H; Xu Q; Sun B
J Cancer; 2019; 10(23):5646-5653. PubMed ID: 31737101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The prognostic value of lymph nodes count on survival of patients with node-negative gastric cancer.
Zheng WF; Ji TT; Lin Y; Li RZ
Oncotarget; 2016 Jul; 7(28):43680-43688. PubMed ID: 27270656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a Higher Cutoff Value of Lymph Node Retrieval Substantially Improve Survival in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer?-Time to Embrace a New Digit.
Liu YY; Fang WL; Wang F; Hsu JT; Tsai CY; Liu KH; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
Oncologist; 2017 Jan; 22(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 27789777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of accurate identification of lymph node status in distant metastatic gastric cancer.
Zhou R; Wu Z; Zhang J; Wang H; Su Y; Huang N; Shi M; Bin J; Liao Y; Liao W
Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(1):1029-41. PubMed ID: 26556854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of lymph nodes count on survival of patients with distal cholangiocarcinomas.
Lin HP; Li SW; Liu Y; Zhou SJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Mar; 24(9):1022-1034. PubMed ID: 29531466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differing risk of cancer death among patients with lymph node metastasis after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: identification of risk categories according to number of positive nodes and Gleason score.
Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Brunocilla E; Manferrari F; Fiorentino M; Vagnoni V; Baccos A; Pultrone CV; Rocca GC; Rizzi S; Martorana G
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1237-44. PubMed ID: 23331345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Deng W; Xu T; Wang Y; Xu Y; Yang P; Gomez D; Liao Z
Lung Cancer; 2018 Aug; 122():60-66. PubMed ID: 30032846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis.
Pan S; Wang P; Xing Y; Li K; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhu Z
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Sep; 39(1):49. PubMed ID: 31519217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel nomograms individually predict the survival of patients with soft tissue sarcomas after surgery.
Zhang SL; Wang ZM; Wang WR; Wang X; Zhou YH
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():3215-3225. PubMed ID: 31114361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of examined lymph node count on prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma.
Li YF; Xiang YC; Zhang QQ; Wang WL
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Aug; 11(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 32953148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nomograms to predict survival after colorectal cancer resection without preoperative therapy.
Zhang ZY; Luo QF; Yin XW; Dai ZL; Basnet S; Ge HY
BMC Cancer; 2016 Aug; 16(1):658. PubMed ID: 27553083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph node count impacts survival following post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for non-seminomatous testicular cancer: a population-based analysis.
Bhanvadia RR; Rodriguez J; Bagrodia A; Eggener SE
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124(5):792-800. PubMed ID: 31054211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nomograms for predicting prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers in colorectal cancer patients after radical resection.
Li Y; Jia H; Yu W; Xu Y; Li X; Li Q; Cai S
Int J Cancer; 2016 Jul; 139(1):220-31. PubMed ID: 26933932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A nomogram for predicting survival and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection treatment in patients with resected testicular germ cell tumors.
Wu Y; Meyers JP; Shi G; Jin Z; Xia J; Gu Y; Qian Q; Hong Y
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 120(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31140623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of retrieved lymph node counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.
Lin H; Wu YS; Li Z; Jiang Y
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Dec; 88(12):E829-E834. PubMed ID: 30207026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic impact of examined lymph node count in pT1N0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study.
Liu Y; Yang H; Fu H; Li M; Feng Z; Peng Z; Liang Z; Wang H
Thorac Cancer; 2019 Jul; 10(7):1636-1643. PubMed ID: 31237106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of comprehensive nomograms for evaluating overall and cancer-specific survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neck dissection.
Shi X; Hu WP; Ji QH
Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(18):29722-29740. PubMed ID: 28430613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Lymph Node Burden on Survival of High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.
Moris L; Van den Broeck T; Tosco L; Van Baelen A; Gontero P; Karnes RJ; Everaerts W; Albersen M; Bastian PJ; Chlosta P; Claessens F; Chun FK; Graefen M; Gratzke C; Kneitz B; Marchioro G; Salas RS; Tombal B; Van Der Poel H; Walz JC; De Meerleer G; Bossi A; Haustermans K; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Spahn M; Briganti A; Joniau S
Front Surg; 2016; 3():65. PubMed ID: 28018903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT-based nomograms to predict lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.
Li J; Fang M; Wang R; Dong D; Tian J; Liang P; Liu J; Gao J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5241-5249. PubMed ID: 29869176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
