161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31737668)
1. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Classification in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.
Wang Y; Wang Y; Fan Z; Shan J; Yan K
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():5698140. PubMed ID: 31737668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Cystic Pancreatic Lesions Using a Simplified Classification Diagnostic Criterion.
Fan Z; Yan K; Wang Y; Qiu J; Wu W; Yang L; Chen M
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():974621. PubMed ID: 26090467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions--a comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT.
Fan Z; Li Y; Yan K; Wu W; Yin S; Yang W; Xing B; Li X; Zhang X
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1385-90. PubMed ID: 23727375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions.
Xu M; Xie XY; Liu GJ; Xu HX; Xu ZF; Huang GL; Chen PF; Luo J; Lü MD
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1432-7. PubMed ID: 21477957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Computer Tomography for the Evaluation of Complex Cystic Renal Lesions.
Tshering Vogel DW; Kiss B; Heverhagen JT; Benackova K; Burkhard F; Müller M; Uehlinger D; Arampatzis S
Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():320-325. PubMed ID: 33984367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic renal lesions in comparison to CT and MRI in a multicenter setting.
Lerchbaumer MH; Putz FJ; Rübenthaler J; Rogasch J; Jung EM; Clevert DA; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fischer T
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 75(4):419-429. PubMed ID: 32039837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system.
Clevert DA; Minaifar N; Weckbach S; Jung EM; Stock K; Reiser M; Staehler M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2008; 39(1-4):171-8. PubMed ID: 18503122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Renal Complex Cystic Masses: Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Their Assessment and Its Agreement with Computed Tomography.
Sanz E; Hevia V; Gómez V; Álvarez S; Fabuel JJ; Martínez L; Rodriguez-Patrón R; González-Gordaliza C; Burgos FJ
Curr Urol Rep; 2016 Dec; 17(12):89. PubMed ID: 27787749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bosniak classification system: a prospective comparison of CT, contrast-enhanced US, and MR for categorizing complex renal cystic masses.
Graumann O; Osther SS; Karstoft J; Hørlyck A; Osther PJ
Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1409-1417. PubMed ID: 26019242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions.
Wang Y; Li G; Yan K; Fan Z; Long R; Shan J; Dai Y; Wu W
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):2060-2069. PubMed ID: 34716476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of indeterminate small solid renal masses and risk stratification of cystic renal lesions.
Elbanna KY; Jang HJ; Kim TK; Khalili K; Guimarães LS; Atri M
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8468-8477. PubMed ID: 33912992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activity-Based Cost Analysis of Including Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Diagnostic Pathway of Focal Pancreatic Lesions Detected by Abdominal Ultrasound.
Faccioli N; Dietrich CF; Foti G; Santi E; Comai A; D'Onofrio M
Ultraschall Med; 2019 Oct; 40(5):618-624. PubMed ID: 30895585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of vascular pattern of solid pancreatic lesions.
Ardelean M; Sirli R; Sporea I; Bota S; Danila M; Popescu A; Timar B; Buzas R; Mazilu O; Ardelean O; Lighezan D
Med Ultrason; 2015 Mar; 17(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 25745652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with time-intensity curve analysis for differentiating hypovascular solid pancreatic lesions.
Wang L; Nie F; Dong T; Li M; Li Y; Yin C
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):4885-4894. PubMed ID: 36725721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with MRI in the diagnosis of complex cystic renal masses: a meta-analysis.
Zhou L; Tang L; Yang T; Chen W
Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 29363321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Evaluation of Bosniak III Complex Renal Cystic Lesions-A 10-Year Specialized European Single-Center Experience with Histopathological Validation.
Schwarze V; Rübenthaler J; Čečatka S; Marschner C; Froelich MF; Sabel BO; Staehler M; Knösel T; Geyer T; Clevert DA
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 33322683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of renal lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); a 10-year retrospective European single-centre analysis.
Rübenthaler J; Negrão de Figueiredo G; Mueller-Peltzer K; Clevert DA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4542-4549. PubMed ID: 29744641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance and Confidence of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Cystic and Cysticlike Liver Lesions.
Corvino A; Catalano O; Corvino F; Sandomenico F; Petrillo A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):W119-W127. PubMed ID: 28639831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Diagnostic Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.
Sun Y; Yang S; Qi E; Liu F; Zhou F; Lu Y; Liang P; Ye H; Yu X
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():2889-2898. PubMed ID: 32425602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound in the characterisation of pancreatic lesions with cystic appearance.
Beyer-Enke SA; Hocke M; Ignee A; Braden B; Dietrich CF
JOP; 2010 Sep; 11(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 20818109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
