BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31738093)

  • 1. Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis.
    Broekstra R; Aris-Meijer J; Maeckelberghe E; Stolk R; Otten S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 31738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.
    Broekstra R; Maeckelberghe ELM; Aris-Meijer JL; Stolk RP; Otten S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 32711531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'I haven't met them, I don't have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown': a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research.
    Carson C; Hinton L; Kurinczuk J; Quigley M
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e026469. PubMed ID: 31152033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
    De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments.
    Wiertz S; Boldt J
    Med Health Care Philos; 2022 Jun; 25(2):269-280. PubMed ID: 35286521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
    Moodley K; Singh S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Consent Based on Trust Morally Inferior to Consent Based on Information?
    Kongsholm NCH; Kappel K
    Bioethics; 2017 Jul; 31(6):432-442. PubMed ID: 28240791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A qualitative study exploring stakeholder perspectives on the use of biological samples for future unspecified research in Malawi.
    Matandika L; Ngóngóla RT; Mita K; Manda-Taylor L; Gooding K; Mwale D; Masiye F; Mfutso-Bengo J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 32689995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Citizens' views on sharing their health data: the role of competence, reliability and pursuing the common good.
    Rivas Velarde MC; Tsantoulis P; Burton-Jeangros C; Aceti M; Chappuis P; Hurst-Majno S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):62. PubMed ID: 34006284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. «If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.
    Ursin L; Ytterhus B; Christensen E; Skolbekken JA
    Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Dec; 23(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 32734531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives.
    Wallace SE; Miola J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 33563268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies.
    Nobile H; Bergmann MM; Moldenhauer J; Borry P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):237-49. PubMed ID: 27381010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'It is an entrustment': Broad consent for genomic research and biobanks in sub-Saharan Africa.
    Tindana P; Molyneux S; Bull S; Parker M
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 29063669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
    Allen J; McNamara B
    Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate Informed Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Surrogate Decision Makers' Perspectives.
    Lane T; Brereton E; Nowels C; McKeehan J; Moss M; Matlock DD
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2021 Jul; 18(7):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 33529538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
    D'Abramo F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Nov; 69(11):1125-8. PubMed ID: 25669218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: a tangible destination.
    Wood F; Kowalczuk J; Elwyn G; Mitchell C; Gallacher J
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):487-92. PubMed ID: 21478424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Race, Trust in Doctors, Privacy Concerns, and Consent Preferences for Biobanks.
    Hong SJ; Drake B; Goodman M; Kaphingst KA
    Health Commun; 2020 Sep; 35(10):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 31167570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.