These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31738093)

  • 1. Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis.
    Broekstra R; Aris-Meijer J; Maeckelberghe E; Stolk R; Otten S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 31738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.
    Broekstra R; Maeckelberghe ELM; Aris-Meijer JL; Stolk RP; Otten S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 32711531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'I haven't met them, I don't have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown': a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research.
    Carson C; Hinton L; Kurinczuk J; Quigley M
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e026469. PubMed ID: 31152033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
    De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments.
    Wiertz S; Boldt J
    Med Health Care Philos; 2022 Jun; 25(2):269-280. PubMed ID: 35286521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
    Moodley K; Singh S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Consent Based on Trust Morally Inferior to Consent Based on Information?
    Kongsholm NCH; Kappel K
    Bioethics; 2017 Jul; 31(6):432-442. PubMed ID: 28240791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A qualitative study exploring stakeholder perspectives on the use of biological samples for future unspecified research in Malawi.
    Matandika L; Ngóngóla RT; Mita K; Manda-Taylor L; Gooding K; Mwale D; Masiye F; Mfutso-Bengo J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 32689995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Citizens' views on sharing their health data: the role of competence, reliability and pursuing the common good.
    Rivas Velarde MC; Tsantoulis P; Burton-Jeangros C; Aceti M; Chappuis P; Hurst-Majno S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):62. PubMed ID: 34006284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. «If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.
    Ursin L; Ytterhus B; Christensen E; Skolbekken JA
    Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Dec; 23(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 32734531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives.
    Wallace SE; Miola J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 33563268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies.
    Nobile H; Bergmann MM; Moldenhauer J; Borry P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):237-49. PubMed ID: 27381010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'It is an entrustment': Broad consent for genomic research and biobanks in sub-Saharan Africa.
    Tindana P; Molyneux S; Bull S; Parker M
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 29063669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
    Allen J; McNamara B
    Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate Informed Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Surrogate Decision Makers' Perspectives.
    Lane T; Brereton E; Nowels C; McKeehan J; Moss M; Matlock DD
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2021 Jul; 18(7):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 33529538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
    D'Abramo F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Nov; 69(11):1125-8. PubMed ID: 25669218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: a tangible destination.
    Wood F; Kowalczuk J; Elwyn G; Mitchell C; Gallacher J
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):487-92. PubMed ID: 21478424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Race, Trust in Doctors, Privacy Concerns, and Consent Preferences for Biobanks.
    Hong SJ; Drake B; Goodman M; Kaphingst KA
    Health Commun; 2020 Sep; 35(10):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 31167570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.