These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31738459)

  • 1. Dataset of Digitized RACs and Their Rarity Score Analysis for Strengthening Shoeprint Evidence.
    Wiesner S; Shor Y; Tsach T; Kaplan-Damary N; Yekutieli Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):762-774. PubMed ID: 31738459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location distribution of randomly acquired characteristics on a shoe sole.
    Kaplan-Damary N; Mandel M; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Wiesner S
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1801-1809. PubMed ID: 35855550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dependence among randomly acquired characteristics on shoeprints and their features.
    Kaplan Damary N; Mandel M; Wiesner S; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Spiegelman C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():173-179. PubMed ID: 29324348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Fagert M; Hite M; Bodziak WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():399-411. PubMed ID: 27416269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracing recent outdoor geolocation by analyzing microbiota from shoe soles and shoeprints even after indoor walking.
    Zhang J; Yu D; Wang Y; Shi L; Wang T; Simayijiang H; Yan J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102869. PubMed ID: 37054666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitally processing an image of a shoe impression in blood.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Chaikovsky A; Cohen Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1143-1147. PubMed ID: 33332705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of footwear evidence: Initial workflow for an end-to-end system.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Lund SP; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2232-2251. PubMed ID: 34374992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in a forensic footwear database.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 37169469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part I - Impressions in blood.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):117-133. PubMed ID: 38182307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inherent variation in multiple shoe-sole test impressions.
    Shor Y; Wiesner S; Tsach T; Gurel R; Yekutieli Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():189-203. PubMed ID: 29428777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Foundations of the Comparison Forensic Sciences: Report of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
    Cordner S; Ranson D; Bassed R
    J Law Med; 2016; 24(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 30137704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part II - Impressions in dust.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):134-150. PubMed ID: 38182308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-Layer Feature Based Shoeprint Verification Algorithm for Camera Sensor Images.
    Wang X; Wu Y; Zhang T
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 31159201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirically observed and predicted estimates of chance association: Estimating the chance association of randomly acquired characteristics in footwear comparisons.
    Richetelli N; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109833. PubMed ID: 31539827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A database of two-dimensional images of footwear outsole impressions.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105508. PubMed ID: 32322634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shoeprint image retrieval and crime scene shoeprint image linking by using convolutional neural network and normalized cross correlation.
    Wen Z; Curran JM; Wevers G
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):439-450. PubMed ID: 37453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of 1276 shoeprint impressions and development of an automatic shoeprint pattern matching facility.
    Hannigan TJ; Fleury LM; Reilly RB; O'Mullane BA; deChazal P
    Sci Justice; 2006; 46(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 17002210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three shoe sole impression lifting methods at high substrate temperatures.
    Taylor KM; Krosch MN; Chaseling J; Wright K
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):303-314. PubMed ID: 33074576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.