These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31738475)
1. Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal-threshold determination in shared decision making. Lin S; Ma Y; Zou H J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 31738475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation. Hajian-Tilaki K Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2374-2383. PubMed ID: 28673124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Youden's Index and the Weight of Evidence Revisited. Hughes G Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(6):576-7. PubMed ID: 26548463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication. Sharifabadi AD; Korevaar DA; McGrath TA; van Es N; Frank RA; Cherpak L; Dang W; Salameh JP; Nguyen F; Stanley C; McInnes MDF Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3632-3639. PubMed ID: 29564596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simple framework to identify optimal cost-effective risk thresholds for a single screen: Comparison to Decision Curve Analysis. Katki HA; Bebu I J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2021 Jul; 184(3):887-903. PubMed ID: 35702631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A note on Youden's J and its cost ratio. Smits N BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Sep; 10():89. PubMed ID: 20920288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Youden's index and the weight of evidence. Hughes G Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 25658987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting Youden's index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Böhning D; Böhning W; Holling H Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 18375457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the severity of Crohn's disease. Liu C; Xu XR; Xu HX; Liu ZJ; Zhang YF; Sun LP; Xu JM; Liu LN; Guo LH; Bo XW Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 25784981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Youden's Index and the Likelihood Ratio Positive in Diagnostic Testing. Böhning D Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(4):382-3. PubMed ID: 26063628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of cutoff levels for screening of gastric cancer using serum pepsinogens and distributions of levels of serum pepsinogen I, II and of PG I/PG II ratios in a gastric cancer case-control study. Aoki K; Misumi J; Kimura T; Zhao W; Xie T J Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 7(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 9337512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index. Hilden J; Glasziou P Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):969-86. PubMed ID: 8783436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of the moving epidemic method in the development of epidemic thresholds and tiered warning alert approachs for influenza prevention in Beijing]. Wang Y; Zhang L; Wu SS; Duan W; Sun Y; Zhang M; Zhang XX; Zhang Y; Ma CN; Wang QY; Yang P Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 41(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 32164130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between early outbreak detection models and simulated outbreaks of measles in Beijing]. Wang XL; Wang QY; Liu DL; Zeng DJ; Cheng H; Li S; Duan W; Li XY; Luan RS; He X Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 30(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 19565878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tjur's R Hughes G Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):801-802. PubMed ID: 29108818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A new index for discrimination between iron deficiency anemia and beta-thalassemia minor: results in 284 patients. Ehsani MA; Shahgholi E; Rahiminejad MS; Seighali F; Rashidi A Pak J Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 12(5):473-5. PubMed ID: 19579993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates. Korevaar DA; van Es N; Zwinderman AH; Cohen JF; Bossuyt PM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():68. PubMed ID: 27267602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies identifies and ranks the optimal diagnostic tests and thresholds for health care policy and decision-making. Owen RK; Cooper NJ; Quinn TJ; Lees R; Sutton AJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():64-74. PubMed ID: 29548843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests - Part 2 [Pre-test and post-test probability and odds, Likelihood ratios, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Youden's Index and Diagnostic test biases]. Gogtay NJ J Assoc Physicians India; 2017 Jul; 65(7):86-91. PubMed ID: 28792173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology. Haltaufderheide J; Wäscher S; Bertlich B; Vollmann J; Reinacher-Schick A; Schildmann J Oncologist; 2019 Apr; 24(4):555-562. PubMed ID: 30190300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]