176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31738655)
1. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system.
Bell BS; Wiechmann D; Ryan AM
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 16551196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.
Bye HH; Sandal GM
J Bus Psychol; 2016; 31(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 27881901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks.
Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1997 Dec; 72(3):308-35. PubMed ID: 9606169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.
Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Jun; 85(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 10900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts.
Truxillo DM; Bauer TN
J Appl Psychol; 1999 Jun; 84(3):322-39. PubMed ID: 10380414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.
Wilhelmy A; Kleinmann M; Melchers KG; Götz M
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():740. PubMed ID: 28611696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Different Rejection Letters on Applicants' Reactions.
Cortini M; Galanti T; Barattucci M
Behav Sci (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 31546985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial attractiveness, applicants' qualifications, and judges' expertise about decisions in preselective recruitment.
Dubois M; Pansu P
Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1129-34. PubMed ID: 15762393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Searching for the right fit: development of applicant person-organization fit perceptions during the recruitment process.
Swider BW; Zimmerman RD; Barrick MR
J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):880-93. PubMed ID: 25486257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.
Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
J Appl Psychol; 1998 Feb; 83(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9494438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.
Schminke M; Ambrose ML; Cropanzano RS
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Apr; 85(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 10783545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field study investigation of applicant use of influence tactics in a selection interview.
McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Kriska SD
J Psychol; 2002 Jul; 136(4):383-98. PubMed ID: 12230141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Company norms affect which traits are preferred in job candidates and may cause employment discrimination.
Björklund F; Backström M; Wolgast S
J Psychol; 2012; 146(6):579-94. PubMed ID: 23094472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.
Jawahar IM; Mattsson J
J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):563-73. PubMed ID: 15910150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Faking to fit in: Applicants' response strategies to match organizational culture.
Roulin N; Krings F
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Feb; 105(2):130-145. PubMed ID: 31233316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing.
Van 't Riet J; Cox AD; Cox D; Zimet GD; De Bruijn GJ; Van den Putte B; De Vries H; Werrij MQ; Ruiter RA
Health Psychol Rev; 2016 Dec; 10(4):447-459. PubMed ID: 27062974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social Media Recruitment: Communication Characteristics and Sought Gratifications.
Carpentier M; Van Hoye G; Weng Q
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1669. PubMed ID: 31379686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does regulatory fit lead to more effective health communication? A systematic review.
Ludolph R; Schulz PJ
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 128():142-50. PubMed ID: 25617673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.
Nørskov S; Damholdt MF; Ulhøi JP; Jensen MB; Ess C; Seibt J
Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():586263. PubMed ID: 33501344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
