265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31738862)
1. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
Meemann K; Smiljanić R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Child, Young Adult, and Older Adult Talkers.
Smiljanic R; Gilbert RC
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 29075748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speaking Clearly for Older Adults With Normal Hearing: The Role of Speaking Rate.
Krause JC; Panagiotopoulos AP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3851-3859. PubMed ID: 31580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
Lu Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
Ferguson SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss.
Ferguson SH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
Calandruccio L; Van Engen K; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
Hazan V; Baker R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundamental frequency range and other acoustic factors that might contribute to the clear-speech benefit.
Han HJ; Munson B; Schlauch RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1685. PubMed ID: 33765811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
Cooke M; Lu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
Gittleman S; Van Engen KJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
