BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31739370)

  • 1. Serrated polyp detection rate and advanced adenoma detection rate from a US multicenter cohort.
    Klair JS; Ashat M; Johnson D; Arora S; Onteddu N; Machain Palacio JG; Samuel R; Bilal M; Buddam A; Gupta A; Gunderson A; Guturu P; Soota K; Chandra S; Murali AR
    Endoscopy; 2020 Jan; 52(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 31739370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of adenoma detection rate on detection of advanced adenomas and endoscopic adverse events in a study of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
    Penz D; Ferlitsch A; Waldmann E; Irina G; Daniel P; Asaturi A; Hinterberger A; Majcher B; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 31499041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between endoscopist adenoma detection rate and serrated polyp detection: Retrospective analysis of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
    Penz D; Pammer D; Waldmann E; Asaturi A; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endosc Int Open; 2024 Apr; 12(4):E488-E497. PubMed ID: 38585017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are adenoma and serrated polyp detection rates correlated with endoscopists' sensitivity of optical diagnosis?
    Bronzwaer MES; Vleugels JLA; van Doorn SC; Dijkgraaf MGW; Fockens P; Dekker E;
    Endoscopy; 2020 Sep; 52(9):763-772. PubMed ID: 32349138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection rates for adenomas, serrated polyps and clinically relevant serrated polyps can be easily estimated by individually calculated detection rate ratios.
    Buerger M; Kasper P; Scheller I; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Allo G; Goeser T; Steffen HM; Schramm C
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 32524866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of comprehensive optical diagnosis training using Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis classification on detection of adenoma and sessile serrated lesion.
    Lee J; Bae JH; Chung SJ; Kang HY; Kang SJ; Kwak MS; Seo JY; Song JH; Yang SY; Yang JI; Lim SH; Yim JY; Lim JH; Chung GE; Jin EH; Choi JM; Han YM; Kim JS
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jan; 34(1):180-190. PubMed ID: 34021513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.
    Mandaliya R; Baig K; Barnhill M; Murugesan V; Som A; Mohammed U; Jhaveri K; Vangimalla SS; Raymond A; Tran J; Hasan L; Lewis JH; Cho W
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(9):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 31152331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates.
    Araujo JL; Jaiswal P; Ragunathan K; Arroyo-Mercado FM; Chawla GS; Li C; Kazmi W; Le A; Gupta N; Chokshi T; Klinger CA; Salim S; Mirza RM; Grossman E; Vignesh S
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33611689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Quality Measures for Detection of Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy.
    Wieszczy P; Bugajski M; Januszewicz W; Rupinska M; Szlak J; Pisera M; Turkot MH; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Regula J; Kaminski MF
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Jan; 21(1):200-209.e6. PubMed ID: 35341951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adenoma Detection Rates for Screening Colonoscopies in Smokers and Obese Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Weiss JE; Robinson CM; Butterly LF
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017; 51(10):e95-e100. PubMed ID: 28059941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy among different indications.
    Mangas-Sanjuan C; Seoane A; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Luè A; Suárez A; Álvarez-García V; Bujanda L; Portillo I; González N; Cid-Gomez L; Cubiella J; Rodríguez-Camacho E; Ponce M; Díez-Redondo P; Herráiz M; Pellisé M; Ono A; Baile-Maxía S; Medina-Prado L; O M; Zapater P; Jover R;
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2022 Nov; 10(9):1008-1019. PubMed ID: 36300971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.