These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31741290)
21. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis. Jahng TA; Kim YE; Moon KY Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis. Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation. Kim Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2558-68. PubMed ID: 17978654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Numerical analysis of the mechanical behaviour of intact and implanted lumbar functional spinal units: Effects of loading and boundary conditions. Talukdar RG; Mukhopadhyay KK; Dhara S; Gupta S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jul; 235(7):792-804. PubMed ID: 33832355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model. McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. Zhong ZC; Wei SH; Wang JP; Feng CK; Chen CS; Yu CH Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jan; 28(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 16426979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. Wu SH; Li Y; Zhang YQ; Li XK; Yuan CF; Hao YL; Zhang ZY; Guo Z Artif Organs; 2013 Dec; 37(12):E191-201. PubMed ID: 24147953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anterior Bridging Bone in a Newly Designed Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Finite Element Analysis. Lee J; Chang SH; Cho HC; Song KS World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e389-e397. PubMed ID: 34284159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Schleicher P; Gerlach R; Schär B; Cain CM; Achatz W; Pflugmacher R; Haas NP; Kandziora F Eur Spine J; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1757-65. PubMed ID: 18841399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical properties of threaded inserts for lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Tencer AF; Hampton D; Eddy S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Nov; 20(22):2408-14. PubMed ID: 8578391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microstructure and mechanical properties of porous titanium structures fabricated by electron beam melting for cranial implants. Moiduddin K Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Feb; 232(2):185-199. PubMed ID: 29332500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Finite element analysis of lattice designed lumbar interbody cage based on the additive manufacturing. Bozyiğit B; Oymak MA; Bahçe E; Uzunyol ÖF Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Aug; 237(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 37366582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical investigation into the structural design of porous additive manufactured cages using numerical and experimental approaches. Tsai PI; Hsu CC; Chen SY; Wu TH; Huang CC Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():14-23. PubMed ID: 27392226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]