190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31741483)
1. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal selection of dental implant for different bone conditions based on the mechanical response.
Roy S; DAS M; Chakraborty P; Biswas JK; Chatterjee S; Khutia N; Saha S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 28869633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study.
Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design of patient specific bone stiffness mimicking scaffold.
Rana M; Chaudhuri A; Biswas JK; Karim SI; Datta P; Karmakar SK; Roychowdhury A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 34227419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel porous-structure implant: finite element study.
Inglam S; Chantarapanich N; Suebnukarn S; Vatanapatimakul N; Sucharitpwatskul S; Sitthiseripratip K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e48-56. PubMed ID: 23527368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
Lee H; Park S; Noh G
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surface treatment on stress distribution in immediately loaded dental implants--a 3D finite element analysis.
Bahrami B; Shahrbaf S; Mirzakouchaki B; Ghalichi F; Ashtiani M; Martin N
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):e89-97. PubMed ID: 24559526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kan B; Coskunses FM; Mutlu I; Ugur L; Meral DG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 25818310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Integration Patterns Around Implant Neck on Stress Distribution in Peri-Implant Bone: A Finite Element Analysis.
Han J; Sun Y; Wang C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):549-558. PubMed ID: 26799928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
