These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31741815)

  • 1. Systematic Review on the Content of Outcome Measurement Instruments on Scar Quality.
    Carrière ME; Kwa KAA; de Haas LEM; Pijpe A; Tyack Z; Ket JCF; van Zuijlen PPM; de Vet HCW; Mokkink LB
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Sep; 7(9):e2424. PubMed ID: 31741815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
    Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Scar Outcomes Using Objective Scar Measurement Tools: An Adjunct to Validated Scar Evaluation Scales.
    Bernabe RM; Madrigal P; Choe D; Pham C; Yenikomshian HA; Gillenwater J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-related keloid scar assessment and outcome measures.
    Nicholas RS; Falvey H; Lemonas P; Damodaran G; Ghannem A; Selim F; Navsaria H; Myers S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Mar; 129(3):648-656. PubMed ID: 22373972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.
    Mundy LR; Miller HC; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Pusic AL
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):792-800. PubMed ID: 27357634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
    van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.
    Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP
    Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 30545695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
    Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhuang Z; Li Y; Wei X
    Burns; 2021 Aug; 47(5):987-998. PubMed ID: 33814214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry.
    Oliveira GV; Chinkes D; Mitchell C; Oliveras G; Hawkins HK; Herndon DN
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 15720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser treatment of specific scar characteristics in hypertrophic scars and keloid: A systematic review.
    Oosterhoff TCH; Beekman VK; van der List JP; Niessen FB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 33645505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.
    Lee KC; Dretzke J; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen N
    Burns Trauma; 2016; 4():14. PubMed ID: 27574684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel.
    Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen N
    Burns; 2020 Feb; 46(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 31708256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
    Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
    Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".
    Busche MN; Thraen AJ; Gohritz A; Rennekampff HO; Vogt PM
    J Burn Care Res; 2018 Jun; 39(4):516-526. PubMed ID: 29596600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy and safety of fractional CO
    Peng W; Zhang X; Kong X; Shi K
    Burns; 2021 Nov; 47(7):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 34493423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in the Treatment of Mature Burn Scars: A Clinical, Histopathological, and Histochemical Study.
    El-Hoshy K; Abdel-Halim MRE; Dorgham D; El-Din Sayed SS; El-Kalioby M
    J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 10(12):36-43. PubMed ID: 29399265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
    Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
    Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.