These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31742324)

  • 1. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic identification of non-canonical transcription factor motifs.
    Chumpitaz-Diaz L; Samee MAH; Pollard KS
    BMC Mol Cell Biol; 2021 Aug; 22(1):44. PubMed ID: 34465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of context-dependent motifs by contrasting ChIP binding data.
    Mason MJ; Plath K; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2826-32. PubMed ID: 20870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Co-Associated Transcription Factors via Ordered Adjacency Differences on Motif Distribution.
    Pan G; Tang J; Guo F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43597. PubMed ID: 28240320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of topic models to a compendium of ChIP-Seq datasets uncovers recurrent transcriptional regulatory modules.
    Yang G; Ma A; Qin ZS; Chen L
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2352-2358. PubMed ID: 31899481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Set cover-based methods for motif selection.
    Li Y; Liu Y; Juedes D; Drews F; Bunescu R; Welch L
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(4):1044-1051. PubMed ID: 31665223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. abc4pwm: affinity based clustering for position weight matrices in applications of DNA sequence analysis.
    Ali O; Farooq A; Yang M; Jin VX; Bjørås M; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):83. PubMed ID: 35240993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RTFBSDB: an integrated framework for transcription factor binding site analysis.
    Wang Z; Martins AL; Danko CG
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(19):3024-6. PubMed ID: 27288497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MAGGIE: leveraging genetic variation to identify DNA sequence motifs mediating transcription factor binding and function.
    Shen Z; Hoeksema MA; Ouyang Z; Benner C; Glass CK
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i84-i92. PubMed ID: 32657363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding de novo methylated DNA motifs.
    Ngo V; Wang M; Wang W
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3287-3293. PubMed ID: 30726880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity.
    Weirauch MT; Yang A; Albu M; Cote AG; Montenegro-Montero A; Drewe P; Najafabadi HS; Lambert SA; Mann I; Cook K; Zheng H; Goity A; van Bakel H; Lozano JC; Galli M; Lewsey MG; Huang E; Mukherjee T; Chen X; Reece-Hoyes JS; Govindarajan S; Shaulsky G; Walhout AJM; Bouget FY; Ratsch G; Larrondo LF; Ecker JR; Hughes TR
    Cell; 2014 Sep; 158(6):1431-1443. PubMed ID: 25215497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ProSampler: an ultrafast and accurate motif finder in large ChIP-seq datasets for combinatory motif discovery.
    Li Y; Ni P; Zhang S; Li G; Su Z
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4632-4639. PubMed ID: 31070745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights.
    Gordân R; Murphy KF; McCord RP; Zhu C; Vedenko A; Bulyk ML
    Genome Biol; 2011 Dec; 12(12):R125. PubMed ID: 22189060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting transcription factor binding using ensemble random forest models.
    Behjati Ardakani F; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1603. PubMed ID: 31723409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
    Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets.
    Machanick P; Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 21486936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.