These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31742756)

  • 1. Overinformative Speakers Are Cooperative: Revisiting the Gricean Maxim of Quantity.
    Rubio-Fernandez P
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12797. PubMed ID: 31742756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speakers and listeners exploit word order for communicative efficiency: A cross-linguistic investigation.
    Rubio-Fernandez P; Mollica F; Jara-Ettinger J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 32969681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast perception as a visual heuristic in the formulation of referential expressions.
    Long M; Moore I; Mollica F; Rubio-Fernandez P
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104879. PubMed ID: 34418775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Redundant Are Redundant Color Adjectives? An Efficiency-Based Analysis of Color Overspecification.
    Rubio-Fernández P
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():153. PubMed ID: 26924999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjective position and referential efficiency in American Sign Language: Effects of adjective semantics, sign type and age of sign exposure.
    Rubio-Fernandez P; Wienholz A; Ballard CM; Kirby S; Lieberman AM
    J Mem Lang; 2022 Oct; 126():. PubMed ID: 38665819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When more is more: redundant modifiers can facilitate visual search.
    Rehrig G; Cullimore RA; Henderson JM; Ferreira F
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 33595751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rational Redundancy in Referring Expressions: Evidence from Event-related Potentials.
    Tourtouri EN; Delogu F; Crocker MW
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Dec; 45(12):e13071. PubMed ID: 34897768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The social basis of referential communication: Speakers construct physical reference based on listeners' expected visual search.
    Jara-Ettinger J; Rubio-Fernandez P
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Nov; 129(6):1394-1413. PubMed ID: 34968132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Referential choice in a second language: evidence for a listener-oriented approach.
    Contemori C; Dussias PE
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 31(10):1257-1272. PubMed ID: 28626775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicative functions of directional verbal probabilities: Speaker's choice, listener's inference, and reference points.
    Honda H; Yamagishi K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2141-2158. PubMed ID: 27550640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interface of Linguistic and Visual Information During Audience Design.
    Fukumura K
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1419-33. PubMed ID: 25475568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker-Specific Generalization of Pragmatic Inferences based on Under- and Over-Informative Prenominal Adjective Use.
    Pogue A; Kurumada C; Tanenhaus MK
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2035. PubMed ID: 26834667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived Desirability of Vocal Fry Among Female Speech Communication Disorders Graduate Students.
    Ligon C; Rountrey C; Rank NV; Hull M; Khidr A
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):805.e21-805.e35. PubMed ID: 29803507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Demonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition.
    Rubio-Fernandez P
    Cogn Psychol; 2022 Dec; 139():101519. PubMed ID: 36436352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading between the lines: Listener's vmPFC simulates speaker cooperative choices in communication games.
    Mi Q; Wang C; Camerer CF; Zhu L
    Sci Adv; 2021 Mar; 7(10):. PubMed ID: 33658199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SPEAKERS' AND LISTENERS' PROCESSES IN A WORD-COMMUNICATION TASK.
    ROSENBERG S; COHEN BD
    Science; 1964 Sep; 145(3637):1201-3. PubMed ID: 14173413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1289-311. PubMed ID: 22671693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word Order Predicts Cross-Linguistic Differences in the Production of Redundant Color and Number Modifiers.
    Wu SA; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12934. PubMed ID: 33452719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension.
    Richardson DC; Dale R
    Cogn Sci; 2005 Nov; 29(6):1045-60. PubMed ID: 21702802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?
    Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.