197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31743350)
1. scafSLICR: A MATLAB-based slicing algorithm to enable 3D-printing of tissue engineering scaffolds with heterogeneous porous microarchitecture.
Nyberg E; O'Sullivan A; Grayson W
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225007. PubMed ID: 31743350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering.
Bittner SM; Smith BT; Diaz-Gomez L; Hudgins CD; Melchiorri AJ; Scott DW; Fisher JP; Mikos AG
Acta Biomater; 2019 May; 90():37-48. PubMed ID: 30905862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and Structure-Function Characterization of 3D Printed Synthetic Porous Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.
Kelly CN; Miller AT; Hollister SJ; Guldberg RE; Gall K
Adv Healthc Mater; 2018 Apr; 7(7):e1701095. PubMed ID: 29280325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D printed dual macro-, microscale porous network as a tissue engineering scaffold with drug delivering function.
Dang HP; Shabab T; Shafiee A; Peiffer QC; Fox K; Tran N; Dargaville TR; Hutmacher DW; Tran PA
Biofabrication; 2019 Apr; 11(3):035014. PubMed ID: 30933941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Permeability and mechanical properties of gradient porous PDMS scaffolds fabricated by 3D-printed sacrificial templates designed with minimal surfaces.
Montazerian H; Mohamed MGA; Montazeri MM; Kheiri S; Milani AS; Kim K; Hoorfar M
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 96():149-160. PubMed ID: 31252172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface modification of 3D-printed porous scaffolds via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of rhBMP-2 to promote osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.
Lee SJ; Lee D; Yoon TR; Kim HK; Jo HH; Park JS; Lee JH; Kim WD; Kwon IK; Park SA
Acta Biomater; 2016 Aug; 40():182-191. PubMed ID: 26868173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Usability of a Low-Cost 3D Printer in a Tissue Engineering Approach for External Ear Reconstruction.
Kuhlmann C; Blum JC; Schenck TL; Giunta RE; Wiggenhauser PS
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 34769096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structure-function assessment of 3D-printed porous scaffolds by a low-cost/open source fused filament fabrication printer.
Vallejos Baier R; Contreras Raggio JI; Toro Arancibia C; Bustamante M; Pérez L; Burda I; Aiyangar A; Vivanco JF
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Apr; 123():111945. PubMed ID: 33812577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fabrication of scalable tissue engineering scaffolds with dual-pore microarchitecture by combining 3D printing and particle leaching.
Mohanty S; Sanger K; Heiskanen A; Trifol J; Szabo P; Dufva M; Emnéus J; Wolff A
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Apr; 61():180-9. PubMed ID: 26838839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiscale porosity in a 3D printed gellan-gelatin composite for bone tissue engineering.
Gupta D; Vashisth P; Bellare J
Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 33761468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design, evaluation, and optimization of 3D printed truss scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Shirzad M; Zolfagharian A; Matbouei A; Bodaghi M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Aug; 120():104594. PubMed ID: 34029944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D printed scaffolds with gradient porosity based on a cellulose nanocrystal hydrogel.
Sultan S; Mathew AP
Nanoscale; 2018 Mar; 10(9):4421-4431. PubMed ID: 29451572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Horizontal Pore and Composition Gradients.
Diaz-Gomez L; Kontoyiannis PD; Melchiorri AJ; Mikos AG
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2019 Jul; 25(7):411-420. PubMed ID: 31169080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quasi-static and dynamic in vitro mechanical response of 3D printed scaffolds with tailored pore size and architectures.
Rotbaum Y; Puiu C; Rittel D; Domingos M
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Mar; 96():176-182. PubMed ID: 30606523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterisation of the surface structure of 3D printed scaffolds for cell infiltration and surgical suturing.
Ruiz-Cantu L; Gleadall A; Faris C; Segal J; Shakesheff K; Yang J
Biofabrication; 2016 Mar; 8(1):015016. PubMed ID: 26930179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of porous tantalum scaffold pore size on osteogenesis and osteointegration: A comprehensive study based on 3D-printing technology.
Luo C; Wang C; Wu X; Xie X; Wang C; Zhao C; Zou C; Lv F; Huang W; Liao J
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Oct; 129():112382. PubMed ID: 34579901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Establishment of a 3D printing system for bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication and the evaluation of its controllability over macro and micro structure precision].
Li R; Chen KL; Wang Y; Liu YS; Zhou YS; Sun YC
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 30773555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shape fidelity, mechanical and biological performance of 3D printed polycaprolactone-bioactive glass composite scaffolds.
Baier RV; Contreras Raggio JI; Giovanetti CM; Palza H; Burda I; Terrasi G; Weisse B; De Freitas GS; Nyström G; Vivanco JF; Aiyangar AK
Biomater Adv; 2022 Mar; 134():112540. PubMed ID: 35525740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vitamin D
Vu AA; Bose S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Mar; 48(3):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 31168676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
