199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31743353)
1. Prosthetic push-off power in trans-tibial amputee level ground walking: A systematic review.
Müller R; Tronicke L; Abel R; Lechler K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225032. PubMed ID: 31743353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of walking speed on minimum toe clearance and on the temporal relationship between minimum clearance and peak swing-foot velocity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.
De Asha AR; Buckley JG
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 24469428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation.
Houdijk H; Wezenberg D; Hak L; Cutti AG
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost.
Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis during Slope Ascent Gait.
Rábago CA; Aldridge Whitehead J; Wilken JM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0166815. PubMed ID: 27977681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transtibial amputee gait efficiency: Energy storage and return versus solid ankle cushioned heel prosthetic feet.
Gardiner J; Bari AZ; Howard D; Kenney L
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28355033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait.
Zmitrewicz RJ; Neptune RR; Walden JG; Rogers WE; Bosker GW
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17023242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy flow analysis of amputee walking shows a proximally-directed transfer of energy in intact limbs, compared to a distally-directed transfer in prosthetic limbs at push-off.
Weinert-Aplin RA; Howard D; Twiste M; Jarvis HL; Bennett AN; Baker RJ
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jan; 39():73-82. PubMed ID: 27836575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking.
Zelik KE; Collins SH; Adamczyk PG; Segal AD; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Kuo AD
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Aug; 19(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 21708509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does ankle power on the prosthetic side influence loading parameters on the sound side during level walking of persons with transfemoral amputation?
Pröbsting E; Altenburg B; Bellmann M; Krug K; Schmalz T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Aug; 46(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 35315835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact on the biomechanics of overground gait of using an 'Echelon' hydraulic ankle-foot device in unilateral trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees.
De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):728-34. PubMed ID: 24997811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-distance walking effects on trans-tibial amputees compensatory gait patterns and implications on prosthetic designs and training.
Yeung LF; Leung AK; Zhang M; Lee WC
Gait Posture; 2012 Feb; 35(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 22055554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses.
Russell Esposito E; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 25628378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.
De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 10():107. PubMed ID: 24134803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increasing ankle push-off work with a powered prosthesis does not necessarily reduce metabolic rate for transtibial amputees.
Quesada RE; Caputo JM; Collins SH
J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3452-3459. PubMed ID: 27702444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.
Davidson AM; Childers WL; Chang YH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Oct; 45(5):410-416. PubMed ID: 34469940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
