These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31744320)

  • 1. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal biomechanical parameters derived from Corvis ST.
    Serbecic N; Beutelspacher S; Markovic L; Roy AS; Shetty R
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 31744320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and correlation of corneal biomechanical measurements obtained by Corvis ST in orthokeratology patients.
    Lu W; Ding W; Ji R; Tian Y; Zhao C; Li H; Jiao M; Guo Z; Leng L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2023 Jun; 46(3):101793. PubMed ID: 36509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of a novel corneal indentation device for corneal biomechanical measurement.
    Lam AK; Hon Y; Leung LK; Lam DC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Jul; 35(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 26094834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability, reproducibility, and age dependency of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device.
    Bak-Nielsen S; Pedersen IB; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
    Cornea; 2015 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25393092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal deformation response parameters of dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Herber R; Vinciguerra R; Lopes B; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 32050237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Li Y; Tian L; Guo LL; Hao Y; Jie Y
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():863240. PubMed ID: 35497328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye retraction and rotation during Corvis ST 'air puff' intraocular pressure measurement and its quantitative analysis.
    Boszczyk A; Kasprzak H; Jóźwik A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):253-262. PubMed ID: 28439976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Properties with Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology in Chinese Population.
    Wu Y; Tian L; Huang YF
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7840284. PubMed ID: 27493965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas.
    Nemeth G; Hassan Z; Csutak A; Szalai E; Berta A; Modis L
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 23909783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement repeatability of the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Miki A; Maeda N; Asai T; Ikuno Y; Nishida K
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 61(6):433-440. PubMed ID: 28983780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.
    Ali NQ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3651-9. PubMed ID: 24833745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry.
    Hon Y; Lam AK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 90(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 23238261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera.
    Valbon BF; Ambrósio R; Fontes BM; Alves MR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 24061834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyser measurements in virgin and post-PRK eyes.
    Chen X; Stojanovic A; Hua Y; Eidet JR; Hu D; Wang J; Utheim TP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109577. PubMed ID: 25302580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma.
    Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Qiao RH; Fang Y; Tian T
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Feb; 130(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 28139518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
    Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters : A praxis-related overview].
    Herber R; Terai N; Pillunat KR; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Spörl E
    Ophthalmologe; 2018 Aug; 115(8):635-643. PubMed ID: 29767348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.