These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31745389)
41. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs. Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Feature-blind attentional suppression of salient distractors. Ma X; Abrams RA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1409-1424. PubMed ID: 37118222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A finer-grained search reveals no evidence of the attentional capture by to-be-ignored features. Rheem H; Cho YS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2441-2457. PubMed ID: 33913088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors. Retell JD; Becker SI; Remington RW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1340-65. PubMed ID: 26299891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control. Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Age-related effects of attentional and oculomotor capture by onsets and color singletons as a function of experience. Colcombe AM; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Peterson MS; Colcombe S; Hahn S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):205-25. PubMed ID: 12750049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Can salient stimuli really be suppressed? Chang S; Egeth HE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):260-269. PubMed ID: 33241528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS. Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture. Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Modulating the influence of recent trial history on attentional capture via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of right TPJ. Lega C; Santandrea E; Ferrante O; Serpe R; Dolci C; Baldini E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():149-160. PubMed ID: 33126008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Does it help to expect distraction? Attentional capture is attenuated by high distractor frequency but not by trial-to-trial predictability. Bogaerts L; van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Mar; 48(3):246-261. PubMed ID: 35130015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms. van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations. Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]