167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31745702)
1. Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy.
Shangguan X; Qian H; Jiang Z; Xin Z; Pan J; Dong B; Xue W
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Mar; 146(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 31745702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic utility of biopsy-derived cell cycle progression score in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy: implications for treatment guidance.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi MR; Bishoff JT; Freedland SJ; Reid J; Brawer M; Stone S; Schlomm T; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):808-814. PubMed ID: 28481440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort.
Cooperberg MR; Simko JP; Cowan JE; Reid JE; Djalilvand A; Bhatnagar S; Gutin A; Lanchbury JS; Swanson GP; Stone S; Carroll PR
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Apr; 31(11):1428-34. PubMed ID: 23460710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Prognostic Utility of a Single-marker Immunohistochemistry Approach with Commercial Gene Expression Profiling Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Leapman MS; Nguyen HG; Cowan JE; Xue L; Stohr B; Simko J; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2018 Nov; 74(5):668-675. PubMed ID: 30181067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cell cycle progression score with two immunohistochemical markers (PTEN and Ki-67) for predicting outcome in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Léon P; Cancel-Tassin G; Drouin S; Audouin M; Varinot J; Comperat E; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Vaessens C; Stone S; Reid J; Sangale Z; Korman P; Rouprêt M; Fromond-Hankard G; Cussenot O
World J Urol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):1495-1500. PubMed ID: 29679140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.
Cooperberg MR; Davicioni E; Crisan A; Jenkins RB; Ghadessi M; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 24998118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy by cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score.
Aktas BK; Ozden C; Bulut S; Tagci S; Erbay G; Gokkaya CS; Baykam MM; Memis A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2527-30. PubMed ID: 25824791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7.
Shangguan X; Dong B; Wang Y; Xu F; Shao X; Sha J; Zhu Y; Pan J; Xue W
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 143(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 27650933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men.
Ross AE; Johnson MH; Yousefi K; Davicioni E; Netto GJ; Marchionni L; Fedor HL; Glavaris S; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Erho N; Lam LL; Humphreys EB; Faraj S; Bezerra SM; Han M; Partin AW; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 26058959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score for predicting systemic disease and response to radiation of biochemical recurrence.
Koch MO; Cho JS; Kaimakliotis HZ; Cheng L; Sangale Z; Brawer M; Welbourn W; Reid J; Stone S
Cancer Biomark; 2016 Jun; 17(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 27314296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic capabilities and clinical utility of cell cycle progression testing, prostate imaging reporting and data system, version 2, and clinicopathologic data in management of localized prostate cancer.
Morris DS; Woods JS; Edwards B; Lenz L; Logan J; Flake DD; Mabey B; Bishoff JT; Cohen T; Stone S
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):366.e19-366.e28. PubMed ID: 33257218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score generated from needle biopsy in men treated with definitive therapy.
Canter DJ; Freedland S; Rajamani S; Latsis M; Variano M; Halat S; Tward J; Cohen T; Stone S; Schlomm T; Bishoff J; Bardot S
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 31243337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel serum biomarker quintet reveals added prognostic value when combined with standard clinical parameters in prostate cancer patients by predicting biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology.
Athanasiou A; Tennstedt P; Wittig A; Huber R; Straub O; Schiess R; Steuber T
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259093. PubMed ID: 34767586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic utility of cell cycle progression score in men with prostate cancer after primary external beam radiation therapy.
Freedland SJ; Gerber L; Reid J; Welbourn W; Tikishvili E; Park J; Younus A; Gutin A; Sangale Z; Lanchbury JS; Salama JK; Stone S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Aug; 86(5):848-53. PubMed ID: 23755923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aetiology and management of earlier vs later biochemical recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Llukani E; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 28220652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
