189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31745704)
21. Calculating the Partition Coefficients of Organic Solvents in Octanol/Water and Octanol/Air.
Nedyalkova MA; Madurga S; Tobiszewski M; Simeonov V
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 31042037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of Atomic Charges on Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient Using Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.
Ogata K; Hatakeyama M; Nakamura S
Molecules; 2018 Feb; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29462850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Solvation free energies via alchemical simulations: let's get honest about sampling, once more.
Procacci P
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Jul; 21(25):13826-13834. PubMed ID: 31211310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantum-mechanical property prediction of solvated drug molecules: what have we learned from a decade of SAMPL blind prediction challenges?
Tielker N; Eberlein L; Hessler G; Schmidt KF; Güssregen S; Kast SM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):453-472. PubMed ID: 33079358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting octanol/water partition coefficient using solvation free energy and solvent-accessible surface area.
Liu XH; Wu CD; Han SK; Wang LS
J Environ Sci (China); 2001 Jul; 13(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 11590759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients and pKa for the SAMPL7 challenge using the SM12, SM8 and SMD solvation models.
Rodriguez SA; Tran JV; Sabatino SJ; Paluch AS
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Sep; 36(9):687-705. PubMed ID: 36117236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting octanol/water partition coefficients using molecular simulation for the SAMPL7 challenge: comparing the use of neat and water saturated 1-octanol.
Sabatino SJ; Paluch AS
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1009-1024. PubMed ID: 34495430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the accuracy and performance of implicit solvent models for drug molecules: conformational ensemble approaches.
Kolář M; Fanfrlík J; Lepšík M; Forti F; Luque FJ; Hobza P
J Phys Chem B; 2013 May; 117(19):5950-62. PubMed ID: 23600402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of two simulation methods to compute solvation free energies and partition coefficients.
Yang L; Ahmed A; Sandler SI
J Comput Chem; 2013 Feb; 34(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 23109246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Application of high-performance liquid chromatography based measurements of lipophilicity to model biological distribution.
Valkó K
J Chromatogr A; 2004 May; 1037(1-2):299-310. PubMed ID: 15214672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prediction of n-octanol/water partition coefficients and acidity constants (pK
Viayna A; Pinheiro S; Curutchet C; Luque FJ; Zamora WJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):803-811. PubMed ID: 34244905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SAMPL6 logP challenge: machine learning and quantum mechanical approaches.
Patel P; Kuntz DM; Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):495-510. PubMed ID: 32002780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Energy-entropy prediction of octanol-water logP of SAMPL7 N-acyl sulfonamide bioisosters.
Falcioni F; Kalayan J; Henchman RH
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):831-840. PubMed ID: 34244906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-throughput determination of octanol/water partition coefficients using a shake-flask method and novel two-phase solvent system.
Morikawa G; Suzuka C; Shoji A; Shibusawa Y; Yanagida A
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2016 Jan; 117():338-44. PubMed ID: 26422471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A neural network based prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients using atomic5 fragmental descriptors.
Molnár L; Keseru GM; Papp A; Gulyás Z; Darvas F
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2004 Feb; 14(4):851-3. PubMed ID: 15012980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Force Field Benchmark of Amino Acids. 2. Partition Coefficients between Water and Organic Solvents.
Zhang H; Jiang Y; Cui Z; Yin C
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1669-1681. PubMed ID: 30047730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL5 data set.
Klamt A; Eckert F; Reinisch J; Wichmann K
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):959-967. PubMed ID: 27460058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. SAMPL7 physical property prediction from EC-RISM theory.
Tielker N; Güssregen S; Kast SM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):933-941. PubMed ID: 34278539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics to Predict P-Glycoprotein Substrates.
Esposito C; Wang S; Lange UEW; Oellien F; Riniker S
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4730-4749. PubMed ID: 32786699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Extended solvent-contact model approach to blind SAMPL5 prediction challenge for the distribution coefficients of drug-like molecules.
Chung KC; Park H
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1019-1033. PubMed ID: 27448686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
