552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31745744)
1. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy.
Sejr-Hansen M; Westra J; Winther S; Tu S; Nissen L; Gormsen L; Petersen SE; Ejlersen J; Isaksen C; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 36(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 31745744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).
Westra J; Tu S; Winther S; Nissen L; Vestergaard MB; Andersen BK; Holck EN; Fox Maule C; Johansen JK; Andreasen LN; Simonsen JK; Zhang Y; Kristensen SD; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Jakobsen L; Reiber JHC; Lassen JF; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e007107. PubMed ID: 29555835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary Artery Stenosis Evaluation by Angiography-Derived FFR: Validation by Positron Emission Tomography and Invasive Thermodilution.
Westra J; Rasmussen LD; Eftekhari A; Winther S; Karim SR; Johansen JK; Hammid O; Søndergaard HM; Ejlersen JA; Gormsen LC; Mogensen LJH; Bøttcher M; Holm NR; Christiansen EH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Oct; 16(10):1321-1331. PubMed ID: 37052562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
Nissen L; Winther S; Westra J; Ejlersen JA; Isaksen C; Rossi A; Holm NR; Urbonaviciene G; Gormsen LC; Madsen LH; Christiansen EH; Maeng M; Knudsen LL; Frost L; Brix L; Bøtker HE; Petersen SE; Bøttcher M
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 19(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 29447342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease.
Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Dohi K; Ishida M; Tanigawa T; Yamada A; Takase S; Nakajima H; Sawai T; Masuda J; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Fujii E; Yamada N; Ito M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jan; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29432130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-step anatomic and function testing by cardiac CT versus second-line functional testing in symptomatic patients with coronary artery stenosis: head-to-head comparison of CT-derived fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging.
Westra J; Li Z; Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Li G; Nissen L; Petersen SE; Ejlersen JA; Isaksen C; Gormsen LC; Urbonaviciene G; Eftekhari A; Weng T; Qu X; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR; Bøttcher M; Tu S
EuroIntervention; 2021 Sep; 17(7):576-583. PubMed ID: 33196446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and fractional flow reserve in patients with angiographic multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Hussain ST; Chiribiri A; Morton G; Bettencourt N; Schuster A; Paul M; Perera D; Nagel E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Jul; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 27430288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
Hwang D; Choi KH; Lee JM; Mejía-Rentería H; Kim J; Park J; Rhee TM; Jeon KH; Lee HJ; Kim HK; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Shin ES; Nam CW; Kwak JJ; Doh JH; Hahn JY; Choi JH; Choi SH; Escaned J; Koo BK; Gwon HC
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Apr; 8(8):e011605. PubMed ID: 30977410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR?
Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 (Dan-NICAD 2): Study design for a controlled study of diagnostic accuracy.
Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Westra J; Isaksen C; Ejlersen JA; Brix L; Kirk J; Urbonaviciene G; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Schmidt SE; Knudsen LL; Madsen LH; Frost L; Petersen SE; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Eftekhari A; Holm NR; Nyegaard M; Chiribiri A; Bøtker HE; Böttcher M
Am Heart J; 2019 Sep; 215():114-128. PubMed ID: 31323454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia.
van Diemen PA; Driessen RS; Kooistra RA; Stuijfzand WJ; Raijmakers PG; Boellaard R; Schumacher SP; Bom MJ; Everaars H; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Reiber JH; Min JK; Leipsic JA; Knuuti J; Underwood RS; van Rossum AC; Danad I; Knaapen P
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Sep; 13(9):1976-1985. PubMed ID: 32305469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis.
Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.
Watarai M; Otsuka M; Yazaki K; Inagaki Y; Kahata M; Kumagai A; Inoue K; Koganei H; Enta K; Ishii Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1963-1969. PubMed ID: 31243612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.
Westra J; Andersen BK; Campo G; Matsuo H; Koltowski L; Eftekhari A; Liu T; Di Serafino L; Di Girolamo D; Escaned J; Nef H; Naber C; Barbierato M; Tu S; Neghabat O; Madsen M; Tebaldi M; Tanigaki T; Kochman J; Somi S; Esposito G; Mercone G; Mejia-Renteria H; Ronco F; Bøtker HE; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jul; 7(14):. PubMed ID: 29980523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concordance between vessel-specific and vascular territory coronary functional assessment: A comparison of quantitative flow ratio and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
Santos LM; Campos CM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Godinho RR; Lopes MAAM; Seleme VB; Côrtes RS; Mendes GAC; Rosa VEE; Lopes NHM; de Brito Junior FS; Abizaid AAC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 May; 103(6):873-884. PubMed ID: 38558510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
