339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31746759)
1. Ten-year trends, predictors and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.
Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Sandhu GS; Bell MR; Gulati R; Eleid MF; Best PJM; Gersh BJ; Singh M; Lerman A; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW;
EuroIntervention; 2021 Feb; 16(15):e1254-e1261. PubMed ID: 31746759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Escalation strategies, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock patients receiving percutaneous left ventricular support.
Patlolla SH; Gilbert ON; Belford PM; Morris BN; Jentzer JC; Pisani BA; Applegate RJ; Zhao DX; Vallabhajosyula S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 37473420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications from percutaneous-left ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.
Vallabhajosyula S; Subramaniam AV; Murphree DH; Patlolla SH; Ya'Qoub L; Kumar V; Verghese D; Cheungpasitporn W; Jentzer JC; Sandhu GS; Gulati R; Shah ND; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bell MR; Barsness GW
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238046. PubMed ID: 32833995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Sepsis-Associated Cardiogenic Shock With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Sato R; Hasegawa D; Guo SC; Nishida K; Dugar S
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 Jan; 38(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 37852913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.
Schwarz B; Abdel-Wahab M; Robinson DR; Richardt G
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2016 Nov; 111(8):715-722. PubMed ID: 26596273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.
Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Bell MR; Sandhu GS; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Schears GJ; Stulak JM; Singh M; Gersh BJ; Jaffe AS; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW
Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e005929. PubMed ID: 31826642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention requiring mechanical circulatory support in patients without cardiogenic shock.
Al-Khadra Y; Alraies MC; Darmoch F; Pacha HM; Soud M; Kaki A; Rab T; Grines CL; Meraj P; Alaswad K; Kwok CS; Mamas M; Kapadia S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 31254325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Nishi T; Ishii M; Tsujita K; Okamoto H; Koto S; Nakai M; Sumita Y; Iwanaga Y; Matoba S; Kobayashi Y; Hirata KI; Hikichi Y; Yokoi H; Ikari Y; Uemura S
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Apr; 11(7):e023713. PubMed ID: 35377180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock After the SHOCK-II Trial.
Nan Tie E; Dinh D; Chan W; Clark DJ; Ajani AE; Brennan A; Dagan M; Cohen N; Oqueli E; Freeman M; Hiew C; Shaw JA; Reid CM; Kaye DM; Stub D; Duffy SJ;
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Mar; 191():125-132. PubMed ID: 36682080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Outcomes and Cost Associated With an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Miller PE; Bromfield SG; Ma Q; Crawford G; Whitney J; DeVries A; Desai NR
JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):926-933. PubMed ID: 35849410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
