These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31746816)

  • 1. Long-Term Stability and Functional Outcome of an Active Middle Ear Implant Regarding Different Coupling Sites.
    Spiegel JL; Kutsch L; Jakob M; Weiss BG; Canis M; Ihler F
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jan; 41(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31746816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E; Riss D; Honeder C; Arnoldner C; Hamzavi JS; Baumgartner WD; Flak S; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient selection for incus body coupling of a totally implantable middle ear implant.
    Zenner HP; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Plinkert P; Zimmermann R; Mauz PS; Limberger A; Maassen MM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 123(6):683-96. PubMed ID: 12953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM; Jung J; Moon IS; Kim SH; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective European multicenter analysis of the functional outcomes after active middle ear implant surgery using the third generation vibroplasty couplers.
    Rahne T; Skarzynski PH; Hagen R; Radeloff A; Lassaletta L; Barbara M; Plontke SK; Mlynski R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 32451668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Henseler MA; Polanski JF; Schlegel C; Linder T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of Direct Oval Window Vibroplasty With Customized Partial Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis (PORP): A Novel Reconstruction Technique to Rehabilitate Mixed Hearing Loss.
    Grueninger I; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Müller J
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10):1507-1514. PubMed ID: 34267101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window.
    Sprinzl GM; Schoerg P; Muck S; Jesenko M; Speiser S; Ploder M; Edlinger SH; Magele A
    Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1434-E1442. PubMed ID: 33210744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardized Active Middle-Ear Implant Coupling to the Short Incus Process.
    Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Rak K; Radeloff A; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1390-8. PubMed ID: 26247138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Marino R; Lampacher P; Dittrich G; Tavora-Vieira D; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan GP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26075675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional results with active middle ear implant or semi-implantable bone conduction device in patients with comparable hearing loss.
    Spiegel JL; Weiss BG; Bertlich M; Stoycheva I; Canis M; Ihler F
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):859-867. PubMed ID: 34469278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vibroplasty in Severe Congenital or Acquired Meatal Stenosis by Coupling an Active Middle Ear Implant to the Short Process of the Incus.
    Thomas JP; Voelter C; Neumann K; Dazert S
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Aug; 38(7):996-1004. PubMed ID: 28538078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the Bone-Conduction HeadBand test useful for predicting the functional outcome of a round window active middle ear implant?
    Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1329-35. PubMed ID: 23867342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term Stability of the Active Middle-ear Implant with Floating-mass Transducer Technology: A Single-center Study.
    Schraven SP; Gromann W; Rak K; Shehata-Dieler W; Hagen R; Mlynski R
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):252-66. PubMed ID: 26796211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Congenital incudostapedial anomalies in adult stapes surgery: a case-series review.
    Kuhn JJ; Lassen LF
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2011; 32(6):477-84. PubMed ID: 21146256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incus footplate assembly: Indication and surgical outcome.
    Park M; Han S; Choi BY; Chang SO; Kim CS; Koo JW
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Nov; 126(11):2569-2573. PubMed ID: 26863914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.