These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31746998)
1. Opening the 'implementation black-box' of the user fee exemption policy for caesarean section in Benin: a realist evaluation. Dossou JP; De Brouwere V; Van Belle S; Marchal B Health Policy Plan; 2020 Mar; 35(2):153-166. PubMed ID: 31746998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost and impact of policies to remove and reduce fees for obstetric care in Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali and Morocco. Witter S; Boukhalfa C; Cresswell JA; Daou Z; Filippi V; Ganaba R; Goufodji S; Lange IL; Marchal B; Richard F; Int J Equity Health; 2016 Aug; 15(1):123. PubMed ID: 27483993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying the Realist Evaluation Approach to the Complex Process of Policy Implementation-The Case of the User Fee Exemption Policy for Cesarean Section in Benin. Dossou JP; Van Belle S; Marchal B Front Public Health; 2021; 9():553980. PubMed ID: 34169051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali? Ravit M; Audibert M; Ridde V; De Loenzien M; Schantz C; Dumont A Int J Equity Health; 2018 Jun; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 29871645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The costs of 'free': Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin's caesarean section exemption policy. Lange IL; Kanhonou L; Goufodji S; Ronsmans C; Filippi V Soc Sci Med; 2016 Nov; 168():53-62. PubMed ID: 27639052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis. Leone T; Cetorelli V; Neal S; Matthews Z BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e009692. PubMed ID: 26823178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inequities in accessibility to and utilisation of maternal health services in Ghana after user-fee exemption: a descriptive study. Ganle JK; Parker M; Fitzpatrick R; Otupiri E Int J Equity Health; 2014 Nov; 13():89. PubMed ID: 25388288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of user fee exemptions on the provision and use of maternal health services: a review of literature. Hatt LE; Makinen M; Madhavan S; Conlon CM J Health Popul Nutr; 2013 Dec; 31(4 Suppl 2):67-80. PubMed ID: 24992804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of patient charges at primary care facilities in Kenya: implications of low adherence to user fee policy for users and facility revenue. Opwora A; Waweru E; Toda M; Noor A; Edwards T; Fegan G; Molyneux S; Goodman C Health Policy Plan; 2015 May; 30(4):508-17. PubMed ID: 24837638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removing user fees for health services: A multi-epistemological perspective on access inequities in Senegal. Mladovsky P; Ba M Soc Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 188():91-99. PubMed ID: 28734964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. User fee exemptions and equity in access to caesarean sections: an analysis of patient survey data in Mali. El-Khoury M; Hatt L; Gandaho T Int J Equity Health; 2012 Aug; 11():49. PubMed ID: 22931249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An implementation evaluation of a policy aiming to improve financial access to maternal health care in Djibo district, Burkina Faso. Belaid L; Ridde V BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():143. PubMed ID: 23216874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inequalities in access to birth by caesarean section in the context of user fee exemption for maternal health services in southwest and north central Nigeria. Ajayi AI Int Health; 2021 Dec; 13(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 32175562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic Evaluation of User-Fee Exemption Policies for Maternal Healthcare in Burkina Faso: Evidence From a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Nguyen HT; Torbica A; Brenner S; Kiendrébéogo JA; Tapsoba L; Ridde V; De Allegri M Value Health; 2020 Mar; 23(3):300-308. PubMed ID: 32197725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of pro-poor exemption policy in Tanzania: policy versus reality. Idd A; Yohana O; Maluka SO Int J Health Plann Manage; 2013; 28(4):e298-309. PubMed ID: 23553614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Rowing against the current': the policy process and effects of removing user fees for caesarean sections in Benin. Dossou JP; Cresswell JA; Makoutodé P; De Brouwere V; Witter S; Filippi V; Kanhonou LG; Goufodji SB; Lange IL; Lawin L; Affo F; Marchal B BMJ Glob Health; 2018; 3(1):e000537. PubMed ID: 29564156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Hidden Costs of a Free Caesarean Section Policy in West Africa (Kayes Region, Mali). Ravit M; Philibert A; Tourigny C; Traore M; Coulibaly A; Dumont A; Fournier P Matern Child Health J; 2015 Aug; 19(8):1734-43. PubMed ID: 25874875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: the impact of phased implementation. Collins D; Quick JD; Musau SN; Kraushaar K; Hussein IM Health Policy Plan; 1996 Mar; 11(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 10155878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocol: a realist review of user fee exemption policies for health services in Africa. Robert E; Ridde V; Marchal B; Fournier P BMJ Open; 2012; 2(1):e000706. PubMed ID: 22275427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. User fee exemption policies in Mali: sustainability jeopardized by the malfunctioning of the health system. Touré L BMC Health Serv Res; 2015; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S8. PubMed ID: 26559879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]