178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31747636)
21. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Physiological Demands of Basic Fire Management Tasks in Members of the Canadian Armed Forces: A Pilot Study.
Chassé É; Théoret D; Poirier MP; Lalonde F
Mil Med; 2023 May; 188(5-6):e942-e948. PubMed ID: 34652444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicting Soldier Task Performance From Physical Fitness Tests: Reliability and Construct Validity of a Soldier Task Test Battery.
Spiering BA; Walker LA; Larcom K; Frykman PN; Allison SC; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2749-2755. PubMed ID: 31343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterising the physical demands of critical tasks across the Royal Australian Air Force.
Carstairs GL; Michael SW; Groeller H; Drain JR
Work; 2024; 77(4):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 38457166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lower-body muscular power predicts performance on urban combat simulation.
Sankari M; Vaara JP; Pihlainen K; Ojanen T; Kyröläinen H
Work; 2024; 77(4):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 38517830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Employment Standards for Australian Urban Firefighters: Part 1: The Essential, Physically Demanding Tasks.
Taylor NA; Fullagar HH; Mott BJ; Sampson JA; Groeller H
J Occup Environ Med; 2015 Oct; 57(10):1063-71. PubMed ID: 26461861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Role of Gender and Physical Performance on Injuries: An Army Study.
Anderson MK; Grier T; Dada EO; Canham-Chervak M; Jones BH
Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):e131-e138. PubMed ID: 28012810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-reported musculoskeletal complaints and injuries and exposure of physical workload in Swedish soldiers serving in Afghanistan.
Halvarsson A; Hagman I; Tegern M; Broman L; Larsson H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195548. PubMed ID: 29621324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Even One Is Too Much: Sole Presence of One of the Risk Factors Overweight, Lack of Exercise, and Smoking Reduces Physical Fitness of Young Soldiers.
Leyk D; Witzki A; Willi G; Rohde U; Rüther T
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S199-203. PubMed ID: 26506188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of physical selection procedures for the British Army. Phase 2: relationship between physical performance tests and criterion tasks.
Rayson M; Holliman D; Belyavin A
Ergonomics; 2000 Jan; 43(1):73-105. PubMed ID: 10661694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.
Allison KF; Keenan KA; Wohleber MF; Perlsweig KA; Pletcher ER; Lovalekar M; Beals K; Coleman LC; Nindl BC
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S85-S90. PubMed ID: 28899656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The application of subjective job task analysis techniques in physically demanding occupations: evidence for the presence of self-serving bias.
Lee-Bates B; Billing DC; Caputi P; Carstairs GL; Linnane D; Middleton K
Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 27875925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.
Hydren JR; Borges AS; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1142-1164. PubMed ID: 28135227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical, physical, and physiological analysis of symmetrical and asymmetrical combat.
Clemente-Suárez VJ; Robles-Pérez JJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Sep; 27(9):2420-6. PubMed ID: 23254545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A method for developing organisation-wide manual handling based physical employment standards in a military context.
Carstairs GL; Ham DJ; Savage RJ; Best SA; Beck B; Billing DC
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 29778310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Physiological and Medical Aspects That Put Women Soldiers at Increased Risk for Overuse Injuries.
Epstein Y; Fleischmann C; Yanovich R; Heled Y
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S107-10. PubMed ID: 26506172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A survey to identify physically demanding tasks performed during storm damage operations by Australian State Emergency Services personnel.
Larsen B; Graham T; Aisbett B
Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 22835624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An observational objective job analysis of role related tasks undertaken by Royal Navy sailors.
Hogan JA; Powell SD; Gribble H; Saunders S; Gunner F; Fallowfield JL; Brown PEH; Allsopp AJ
Work; 2024; 77(4):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 38339949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revalidating U.S. Army soldiers' perceptions of combat arms job tasks: Frequencies, importance and expectations of performance.
Boye MW; Cohen BS; Canino MC; Foulis SA; Sharp MA
Work; 2021; 70(3):997-1007. PubMed ID: 34744046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Content Validity Index and Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of a New Muscle Strength/Endurance Test Battery for Swedish Soldiers.
Larsson H; Tegern M; Monnier A; Skoglund J; Helander C; Persson E; Malm C; Broman L; Aasa U
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132185. PubMed ID: 26177030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
