These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31747845)

  • 41. Judgments of facial attractiveness as a combination of facial parts information over time: Social and aesthetic factors.
    Saegusa C; Watanabe K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Something to smile about: the interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression.
    Golle J; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 23875865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preadolescents' recognition of faces of unfamiliar peers: the effect of attractiveness of faces.
    Mallet P; Lallemand N
    J Genet Psychol; 2003 Dec; 164(4):453-71. PubMed ID: 14719778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Trusting the Looks of Others: Gaze Effects of Faces in Social Settings.
    Kaisler RE; Leder H
    Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):875-892. PubMed ID: 27071635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Changing perception: facial reanimation surgery improves attractiveness and decreases negative facial perception.
    Dey JK; Ishii M; Boahene KD; Byrne PJ; Ishii LE
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jan; 124(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 23775545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of position and context on facial attractiveness.
    Rodway P; Schepman A; Lambert J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 24140819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fertility affects asymmetry detection not symmetry preference in assessments of 3D facial attractiveness.
    Lewis MB
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():130-138. PubMed ID: 28558313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder.
    Kwart DG; Foulsham T; Kingstone A
    Perception; 2012; 41(8):925-38. PubMed ID: 23362670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures.
    Zhan J; Liu M; Garrod OGB; Daube C; Ince RAA; Jack RE; Schyns PG
    Curr Biol; 2021 May; 31(10):2243-2252.e6. PubMed ID: 33798430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Facial aging, attractiveness, and distinctiveness.
    Deffenbacher KA; Vetter T; Johanson J; O'Toole AJ
    Perception; 1998; 27(10):1233-43. PubMed ID: 10505202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Facial-Attractiveness Choices Are Predicted by Divisive Normalization.
    Furl N
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 27565534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Older and younger adults' accuracy in discerning health and competence in older and younger faces.
    Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG; Boshyan J; Luevano V; Agrigoroaei S; Milosavljevic B; Lachman ME
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Sep; 29(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25244467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Beauty is better pursued: effects of attractiveness in multiple-face tracking.
    Liu CH; Chen W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):553-64. PubMed ID: 22117090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Serial dependence in the perception of attractiveness.
    Xia Y; Leib AY; Whitney D
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):28. PubMed ID: 28006077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fourier power spectrum characteristics of face photographs: attractiveness perception depends on low-level image properties.
    Menzel C; Hayn-Leichsenring GU; Langner O; Wiese H; Redies C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122801. PubMed ID: 25835539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception.
    Hehman E; Sutherland CAM; Flake JK; Slepian ML
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Oct; 113(4):513-529. PubMed ID: 28481616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of averageness on children's judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Aug; 115(4):624-39. PubMed ID: 23708730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):63-9. PubMed ID: 17986435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Young and older emotional faces: are there age group differences in expression identification and memory?
    Ebner NC; Johnson MK
    Emotion; 2009 Jun; 9(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 19485610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.