These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31748223)

  • 1. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
    Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
    BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.
    Elden H; Hagberg H; Wessberg A; Sengpiel V; Herbst A; Bullarbo M; Bergh C; Bolin K; Malbasic S; Saltvedt S; Stephansson O; Wikström AK; Ladfors L; Wennerholm UB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():49. PubMed ID: 26951777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials.
    Bernardes TP; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans CM; Boers KE; van Wyk L; Tajik P; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Mol BW; Franssen MT; van den Berg PP; Groen H
    BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1501-8. PubMed ID: 27173131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
    Gülmezoglu AM; Crowther CA; Middleton P; Heatley E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; 6(6):CD004945. PubMed ID: 22696345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate delivery or expectant management in gestational diabetes at term: the GINEXMAL randomised controlled trial.
    Alberico S; Erenbourg A; Hod M; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Neri F; Ronfani L; Maso G;
    BJOG; 2017 Mar; 124(4):669-677. PubMed ID: 27813240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
    PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
    Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
    Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT-II): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Langenveld J; Broekhuijsen K; van Baaren GJ; van Pampus MG; van Kaam AH; Groen H; Porath M; Oudijk MA; Bloemenkamp KW; Groot CJ; van Beek E; van Huizen ME; Oosterbaan HP; Willekes C; Wijnen-Duvekot EJ; Franssen MT; Perquin DA; Sporken JM; Woiski MD; Bremer HA; Papatsonis DN; Brons JT; Kaplan M; Nij Bijvanck BW; Mol BW;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2011 Jul; 11():50. PubMed ID: 21736705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.
    Morris JM; Roberts CL; Bowen JR; Patterson JA; Bond DM; Algert CS; Thornton JG; Crowther CA;
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10017):444-52. PubMed ID: 26564381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT).
    Boers KE; Vijgen SM; Bijlenga D; van der Post JA; Bekedam DJ; Kwee A; van der Salm PC; van Pampus MG; Spaanderman ME; de Boer K; Duvekot JJ; Bremer HA; Hasaart TH; Delemarre FM; Bloemenkamp KW; van Meir CA; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Rijken M; le Cessie S; Roumen FJ; Thornton JG; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Scherjon SA;
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c7087. PubMed ID: 21177352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.
    Walker KF; Bugg G; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Wildsmith C; Smith G; Thornton J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():145. PubMed ID: 23231750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia in low-income and middle-income countries (CRADLE-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Beardmore-Gray A; Vousden N; Seed PT; Vwalika B; Chinkoyo S; Sichone V; Kawimbe AB; Charantimath U; Katageri G; Bellad MB; Lokare L; Donimath K; Bidri S; Goudar S; Sandall J; Chappell LC; Shennan AH;
    Lancet; 2023 Jul; 402(10399):386-396. PubMed ID: 37393919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial.
    Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Bossuyt PM; van Kaam AH; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2022 Dec; 16():100165. PubMed ID: 36262791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between timing of labor induction and neonatal and maternal outcomes: an observational study from China.
    Hu Y; Chen B; Wang X; Zhu S; Bao S; Lu J; Wang L; Wang W; Wu C; Qi L; Wang Y; Li F; Xie W; Wu Y; Hu L; Xia Y; Lou B; Guo R; Xie B; Chen X; Han Y; Chen D; Ma H; Liang Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Oct; 6(10):101456. PubMed ID: 39151749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
    Boulvain M; Senat MV; Perrotin F; Winer N; Beucher G; Subtil D; Bretelle F; Azria E; Hejaiej D; Vendittelli F; Capelle M; Langer B; Matis R; Connan L; Gillard P; Kirkpatrick C; Ceysens G; Faron G; Irion O; Rozenberg P;
    Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Alkmark M; Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Bergh C; Carlsson Y; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Hagberg H; Svensson M
    BJOG; 2022 Dec; 129(13):2157-2165. PubMed ID: 34534404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.
    Smith CA; Armour M; Dahlen HG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 10(10):CD002962. PubMed ID: 29036756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.