These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31748833)

  • 1. Estimation of Spinal Loading During Manual Materials Handling Using Inertial Motion Capture.
    Larsen FG; Svenningsen FP; Andersen MS; de Zee M; Skals S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 48(2):805-821. PubMed ID: 31748833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system.
    Faber GS; Chang CC; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 26795123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion-based prediction of external forces and moments and back loading during manual material handling tasks.
    Muller A; Pontonnier C; Robert-Lachaine X; Dumont G; Plamondon A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102935. PubMed ID: 31479837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic forces acting on the lumbar spine during manual handling. Can they be estimated using electromyographic techniques alone?
    Dolan P; Kingma I; van Dieen J; de Looze MP; Toussaint HM; Baten CT; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 10209801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manual material handling in the supermarket sector. Part 2: Knee, spine and shoulder joint reaction forces.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; Andersen LL; Andersen MS; de Zee M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103345. PubMed ID: 33444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating Compressive and Shear Forces at L5-S1: Exploring the Effects of Load Weight, Asymmetry, and Height Using Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems.
    Nail-Ulloa I; Zabala M; Sesek R; Chen H; Schall MC; Gallagher S
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 38544203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of lumbar spine loading from a musculoskeletal model including the lower limbs and lumbar spine.
    Actis JA; Honegger JD; Gates DH; Petrella AJ; Nolasco LA; Silverman AK
    J Biomech; 2018 Feb; 68():107-114. PubMed ID: 29310946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of spinal disc translational stiffness on the lumbar spinal loads, ligament forces and trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination.
    Arshad R; Zander T; Bashkuev M; Schmidt H
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():54-62. PubMed ID: 28666589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dynamic 3D biomechanical evaluation of the load on the low back during different patient-handling tasks.
    Skotte JH; Essendrop M; Hansen AF; Schibye B
    J Biomech; 2002 Oct; 35(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 12231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the L5S1 flexion/extension moment in symmetrical lifting using a simplified ambulatory measurement system.
    Koopman AS; Kingma I; Faber GS; Bornmann J; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():242-248. PubMed ID: 29054609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Back loading estimation during team handling: Is the use of only motion data sufficient?
    Muller A; Corbeil P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244405. PubMed ID: 33351839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying interactive effects of task demands in lifting on estimates of in vivo low back joint loads.
    Gooyers CE; Beach TAC; Frost DM; Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():203-210. PubMed ID: 29122191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subject-specific 2D/3D image registration and kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of the spine.
    Eskandari AH; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Farahmand F
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 57():18-26. PubMed ID: 28365064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.