These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31749388)

  • 41. Promoting patients' rights at the end of life in a geriatric setting in France: The healthcare professionals' level of knowledge about surrogate decision-makers and advance directives.
    Rwabihama JP; Belmin J; Rakotoarisoa R; Hagege M; Audureau E; Benzengli H; Ambime G; Rabus MT; Bastuji-Garin S; Paillaud E; Oubaya N
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Jul; 103(7):1390-1398. PubMed ID: 32070651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Uncharted terrain: preference construction at the end of life.
    White MT
    J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 24972062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Capacity for Preferences: Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision-Making.
    Wasserman JA; Navin MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 May; 48(3):31-39. PubMed ID: 29806903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Deciding For When You Can't Decide: The Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic).
    Hempton C; Bhatia N
    J Bioeth Inq; 2020 Mar; 17(1):109-120. PubMed ID: 32056125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?
    Moore JA; Gallagher CM
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A systematic evaluation of advance care planning patient educational resources.
    Gazarian PK; Cronin J; Dalto JL; Baker KM; Friel BJ; Bruce-Baiden W; Rodriguez LY
    Geriatr Nurs; 2019; 40(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 30318178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Empathy in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Harmsen IE
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Oct; 49(10):3939-3955. PubMed ID: 31147901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ethically Relevant Differences in Advance Directives for Psychiatric and End-of-Life Care.
    Olsen DP
    J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc; 2016; 22(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 26929232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The state of advance care planning: one decade after SUPPORT.
    Collins LG; Parks SM; Winter L
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2006; 23(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 17060305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Patient values: the guide to medical decision making.
    Miller DL; Bolla LR
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1998 Nov; 14(4):813-29. PubMed ID: 9799481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals.
    Peicius E; Blazeviciene A; Kaminskas R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 28583175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Changing the Question.
    Brudney D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Mar; 49(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 30998280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patient Preferences and Surrogate Decision Making in Neuroscience Intensive Care Units.
    Cai X; Robinson J; Muehlschlegel S; White DB; Holloway RG; Sheth KN; Fraenkel L; Hwang DY
    Neurocrit Care; 2015 Aug; 23(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 25990137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Family decision making at end of life.
    Meeker MA; Jezewski MA
    Palliat Support Care; 2005 Jun; 3(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 16594438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The doctor-proxy relationship: perception and communication.
    Zelenik J; Post LF; Mulvihill M; Jacobs LG; Burton WB; Dubler NN
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11657138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Advance directives as a tool to respect patients' values and preferences: discussion on the case of Alzheimer's disease.
    Porteri C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 29458429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. What about process? Limitations in advance directives, care planning, and noncapacitated decision making.
    Berger JT
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 20379918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Foreword: planning for the future through advance directive instruments.
    Winick BJ
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):579-609. PubMed ID: 12803208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Christian thinking about advance medical directives.
    Meilaender G
    Christ Century; 1996 Sep 11-18; 113(26):854-7. PubMed ID: 11654836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.