BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31749599)

  • 1. PARAMETER AND UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION FOR DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS USING SURROGATE STOCHASTIC PROCESSES.
    Chung M; Binois M; Gramacy RB; Bardsley JM; Moquin DJ; Smith AP; Smith AM
    SIAM J Sci Comput; 2019; 41(4):A2212-A2238. PubMed ID: 31749599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning stochastic process-based models of dynamical systems from knowledge and data.
    Tanevski J; Todorovski L; Džeroski S
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Mar; 10():30. PubMed ID: 27005698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology.
    Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Parameter Estimation Methods in Stochastic Chemical Kinetic Models: Examples in Systems Biology.
    Gupta A; Rawlings JB
    AIChE J; 2014 Apr; 60(4):1253-1268. PubMed ID: 27429455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear functional response parameter estimation in a stochastic predator-prey model.
    Gilioli G; Pasquali S; Ruggeri F
    Math Biosci Eng; 2012 Jan; 9(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 22229397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian inference for dynamical systems.
    Roda WC
    Infect Dis Model; 2020; 5():221-232. PubMed ID: 32021948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian Approach to the Estimation of Parameters and Their Interdependencies in Environmental Modeling.
    Albert CG; Callies U; von Toussaint U
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 35205527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parameter uncertainty quantification using surrogate models applied to a spatial model of yeast mating polarization.
    Renardy M; Yi TM; Xiu D; Chou CS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 May; 14(5):e1006181. PubMed ID: 29813055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian approach to parameter estimation in HIV dynamical models.
    Putter H; Heisterkamp SH; Lange JM; de Wolf F
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2199-214. PubMed ID: 12210633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of approximate versus exact techniques for Bayesian parameter inference in nonlinear ordinary differential equation models.
    Alahmadi AA; Flegg JA; Cochrane DG; Drovandi CC; Keith JM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Mar; 7(3):191315. PubMed ID: 32269786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An adaptive Kriging surrogate method for efficient joint estimation of hydraulic and biochemical parameters in reactive transport modeling.
    Zhou J; Su X; Cui G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Sep; 216():50-57. PubMed ID: 30170768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference of progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Chen distribution with an application.
    Ahmed EA; Ali Alhussain Z; Salah MM; Haj Ahmed H; Eliwa MS
    J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(13-15):2492-2524. PubMed ID: 35707419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting industrial-scale cell culture seed trains-A Bayesian framework for model fitting and parameter estimation, dealing with uncertainty in measurements and model parameters, applied to a nonlinear kinetic cell culture model, using an MCMC method.
    Hernández Rodríguez T; Posch C; Schmutzhard J; Stettner J; Weihs C; Pörtner R; Frahm B
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2019 Nov; 116(11):2944-2959. PubMed ID: 31347693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Rao-Blackwellized particle filter for joint parameter estimation and biomass tracking in a stochastic predator-prey system.
    Martín-Fernández L; Gilioli G; Lanzarone E; Miguez J; Pasquali S; Ruggeri F; Ruiz DP
    Math Biosci Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):573-97. PubMed ID: 24506552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian learning and predictability in a stochastic nonlinear dynamical model.
    Parslow J; Cressie N; Campbell EP; Jones E; Murray L
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jun; 23(4):679-98. PubMed ID: 23865222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal Model Parameter Estimation from EEG Power Spectrum Features Observed during General Anesthesia.
    Hashemi M; Hutt A; Buhry L; Sleigh J
    Neuroinformatics; 2018 Apr; 16(2):231-251. PubMed ID: 29516302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning Deep Generative Models With Doubly Stochastic Gradient MCMC.
    Du C; Zhu J; Zhang B
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2018 Jul; 29(7):3084-3096. PubMed ID: 28678716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.