These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3174992)

  • 1. Aqueductal stenosis: evaluation with gradient-echo rapid MR imaging.
    Atlas SW; Mark AS; Fram EK
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 3174992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vascular intracranial lesions: applications of gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Atlas SW; Mark AS; Fram EK; Grossman RI
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):455-61. PubMed ID: 3174993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The superior pericardial sinus: normal appearance on gradient-echo MR images.
    Black CM; Hedges LK; Javitt MC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Apr; 160(4):749-51. PubMed ID: 8456656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic aqueductoplasty by using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schroeder HW; Schweim C; Schweim KH; Gaab MR
    J Neurosurg; 2000 Aug; 93(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 10930009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cine-MR imaging of aqueductal CSF flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome before and after CSF shunt.
    Mascalchi M; Arnetoli G; Inzitari D; Dal Pozzo G; Lolli F; Caramella D; Bartolozzi C
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Nov; 34(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 8240894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part II. Spinal cord disease.
    Enzmann DR; Rubin JB
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 3336723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
    Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of magnetic susceptibility contrast medium on myocardial signal intensity with fast gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo MR imaging: initial experience in humans.
    Sakuma H; O'Sullivan M; Lucas J; Wendland MF; Saeed M; Dulce MC; Watson A; Bleyl KL; LaFrance ND; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):161-6. PubMed ID: 8259398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative evaluation of intraabdominal tumors in children: gradient-recalled echo vs spin-echo MR imaging.
    Shady KL; Siegel MJ; Brown JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):843-7. PubMed ID: 8372772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Aqueductal stenosis in the neurofibromatosis type 1. Presentation of 19 infantile patients].
    Pascual-Castroviejo I; Pascual-Pascual SI; Velázquez-Fragua R; Viaño J; Carceller-Benito F
    Rev Neurol; 2007 Jul 1-15; 45(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17620261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cerebrospinal fluid-iophendylate contrast on gradient-echo MR images.
    Jack CR; Gehring DG; Ehman RL; Felmlee JP
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):561-3. PubMed ID: 3175007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR imaging of the portal venous system: value of gradient-echo imaging as an adjunct to spin-echo imaging.
    Silverman PM; Patt RH; Garra BS; Horii SC; Cooper C; Hayes WS; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Aug; 157(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1853810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR imaging of the brain: comparison of gradient-echo and spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Fok EC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):959-62. PubMed ID: 7677001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal heart: evaluation with echo-planar MR imaging.
    Davis CP; McKinnon GC; Debatin JF; Wetter D; Eichenberger AC; Duewell S; von Schulthess GK
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):691-6. PubMed ID: 8184048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indications for neuroendoscopic aqueductoplasty without stenting for obstructive hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis.
    Miki T; Nakajima N; Wada J; Haraoka J
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Jun; 48(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 16015489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T.
    Yao L; Sinha S; Seeger LL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 1370362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Septa in the liver of patients with chronic hepatic schistosomiasis japonica: MR appearance.
    Monzawa S; Ohtomo K; Oba H; Nogata Y; Kachi K; Uchiyama G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1347-51. PubMed ID: 8191996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast multiphase MR imaging of aqueductal CSF flow: 1. Study of healthy subjects.
    Ciraolo L; Mascalchi M; Bucciolini M; Dal Pozzo G
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990 May; 11(3):589-96. PubMed ID: 2112326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hepatic neoplasia: breath-hold MR imaging.
    Winkler ML; Thoeni RF; Luh N; Kaufman L; Margulis AR
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):801-6. PubMed ID: 2916032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.