These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31750710)

  • 1. The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
    Vachon F; Marsh JE; Labonté K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jul; 149(7):1360-1397. PubMed ID: 31750710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual semantic interactions between linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli: The time-courses and categorical specificity.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1488-1507. PubMed ID: 29708379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing.
    Meng Z; Lan Z; Yan G; Marsh JE; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1892-1905. PubMed ID: 32437187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres?
    Chiarello C; Richards L; Pollock A
    Brain Lang; 1992 Jan; 42(1):52-76. PubMed ID: 1547469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distraction at the cocktail party: Attenuation of the irrelevant speech effect after a training of auditory selective attention.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jan; 46(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31436452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic processing of unattended meaning is modulated by additional task load: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):500-12. PubMed ID: 16099362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking.
    Vasilev MR; Liversedge SP; Rowan D; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1484-1512. PubMed ID: 31436455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. L
    Shafiee Nahrkhalaji S; Lotfi AR; Koosha M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1247-64. PubMed ID: 26643309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why star retrieves scar: Binding and retrieval of perceptual distractor features.
    Laub R; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 31180703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of the lexical-semantic network by auditory semantic priming: an event-related functional MRI study.
    Kotz SA; Cappa SF; von Cramon DY; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2002 Dec; 17(4):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12498750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching.
    Escera C; Yago E; Corral MJ; Corbera S; Nuñez MI
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(8):2408-12. PubMed ID: 14622204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
    Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task.
    Luo CR; Johnson RA; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):833-43. PubMed ID: 9701974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N400 and automatic semantic processing abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia.
    Mathalon DH; Faustman WO; Ford JM
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 59(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 12090817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
    Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.