BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31750762)

  • 1. Robotic Radical Nephrectomy for Massive Renal Tumors.
    Abaza R; Gerhard RS; Martinez O
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Feb; 30(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 31750762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-Institutional Experience with Robotic Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy.
    Abaza R; Shabsigh A; Castle E; Allaf M; Hu JC; Rogers C; Menon M; Aron M; Sundaram CP; Eun D
    J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 1):865-71. PubMed ID: 26602891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes following robotic radical nephrectomy: a single-center experience.
    Dogra PN; Abrol N; Singh P; Gupta NP
    Urol Int; 2012; 89(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 22538353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of Robotic Nephrectomy Including Highest-complexity Cases: Largest Series to Date and Literature Review.
    Petros FG; Angell JE; Abaza R
    Urology; 2015 Jun; 85(6):1352-8. PubMed ID: 25892027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.
    Komninos C; Shin TY; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Koo KC; Chang CH; Kim SW; Ha JY; Han WK; Rha KH
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 24275311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. cT1a Renal Masses Less Than 2 versus 2 cm or Greater Managed by Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
    Bertolo R; Garisto J; Dagenais J; Sagalovich D; Agudelo J; Stein R; Fareed K; Gao T; Fergany A; Kaouk J
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 30100402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.
    Hu JC; Treat E; Filson CP; McLaren I; Xiong S; Stepanian S; Hafez KS; Weizer AZ; Porter J
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 24857539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic inferior vena cava surgery.
    Davila VJ; Velazco CS; Stone WM; Fowl RJ; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Castle EP; Money SR
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2017 Mar; 5(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 28214486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.
    Hemal AK; Kumar A
    World J Urol; 2009 Feb; 27(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 18704439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparative analysis and cost considerations.
    Helmers MR; Ball MW; Gorin MA; Pierorazio PM; Allaf ME
    Can J Urol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):8435-8440. PubMed ID: 27705727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience.
    Malkoc E; Ramirez D; Kara O; Maurice MJ; Nelson RJ; Caputo PA; Kaouk JH
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):781-787. PubMed ID: 27663423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm.
    Tiu A; Kim KH; Shin TY; Han WK; Han SW; Rha KH
    Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 23219087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does size matter? Comparing robotic versus open radical nephrectomy for very large renal masses.
    Pahouja G; Sweigert SE; Sweigert PJ; Gorbonos A; Patel HD; Gupta GN
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):456.e1-456.e7. PubMed ID: 35667982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for stage T1 and large stage T2 renal tumors.
    Patel VR; Leveillee RJ
    J Endourol; 2003 Aug; 17(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 12965063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Masses with Level I and II Thrombus.
    Cinar O; Gunseren KO; Cicek C; Vuruskan BA; Vuruskan H
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 30004287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective comparative study between retroperitoneoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic approach for radical nephrectomy.
    Tobias-Machado M; Ravizzini PI; Pertusier LO; Pedroso E; Wroclawski ER
    Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(3):284-91; discussion 291-2. PubMed ID: 19538763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic unclamped "minimal-margin" partial nephrectomy: ongoing refinement of the anatomic zero-ischemia concept.
    Satkunasivam R; Tsai S; Syan S; Bernhard JC; de Castro Abreu AL; Chopra S; Berger AK; Lee D; Hung AJ; Cai J; Desai MM; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):705-12. PubMed ID: 26071789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed on ≥ 10 cm tumors.
    Ouellet S; Carmel M; Martel A; Sabbagh R
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7487-95. PubMed ID: 25347376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes for Radical Nephrectomy Based on Surgical Approach for Masses Greater Than 10 cm.
    Grimaud LW; Chen FV; Chang J; Ziogas A; Sfakianos JP; Badani KK; Uchio EM; Anton-Culver H; Gin GE
    J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1785-1792. PubMed ID: 34148404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous totally robotic rectal resection and partial nephrectomy: case report and review of literature.
    Cochetti G; Tiezzi A; Spizzirri A; Giuliani D; Rossi de Vermandois JA; Maiolino G; Coccetta M; Napolitano V; Pennetti Pennella F; Francesconi S; Mearini E
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):86. PubMed ID: 32366262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.