267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31750801)
1. Fracture Resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Capped and Uncapped Bulk-fill Resin-based Materials.
Al-Nahedh HN; Alawami Z
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E43-E56. PubMed ID: 31750801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
Al-Nahedh HN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites.
Fronza BM; Rueggeberg FA; Braga RR; Mogilevych B; Soares LE; Martin AA; Ambrosano G; Giannini M
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1542-51. PubMed ID: 26608118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites.
Kim RJ; Kim YJ; Choi NS; Lee IB
J Dent; 2015 Apr; 43(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 25676178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth.
Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing.
Guerra L; Ramos RQ; Linhares LA; Bernardon JK; Favero SS; César PF; Júnior SM
Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 36656317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymerization Stress and Gap Formation of Self-adhesive, Bulk-fill and Flowable Composite Resins.
Nakano EL; de Souza A; Boaro L; Catalani LH; Braga RR; Gonçalves F
Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):E308-E316. PubMed ID: 32516396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical properties of bulk-fill composite resin with or without a final layer of conventional composite resin.
Lara L; Rocha MG; Menezes LR; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MAC; Oliveira D
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(3):60-64. PubMed ID: 35467546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear Resistance of Bulk-fill Composite Resin Restorative Materials Polymerized under different Curing Intensities.
Alkhudhairy F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 28050983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
